Chinese Man Successfully Sues Wife for Ugly Children

A wonderful article from Russia Today came to my attention yesterday, Chinese man sues wife over ugly child – and wins $120,000, and good on him.  Expect many more of these lawsuits in the future.  It has always bugged me the way women commoditise their bodies: slathering on cosmetics, changing their hair colour, getting boob jobs, injecting botox into their faces and the list goes on and on.  Apart from the fact we’re told we men should not objectify women when women clearly are the biggest sexual objectifiers of their bodies, I found myself worried that such women have no honour.  A big part about honour is honesty and a woman with a fake body is not being honest about herself.  For me as a man, I look at a woman’s body and her features to guage how healthy she is physically and if she would produce good children for me because frankly I’m shopping for a good mother for my children.  Sure, once I’ve ascertained that the woman in question is healthy and well-formed, then I’ll worry about her IQ and maternal temperament, but I make no apologies for selecting out the biologically weak women because this is my children’s future and a good parent cares about the future they give their children.  A good parent wants their children to be healthy, attractive and well looked after.  Selecting a decent mother is the single biggest thing a man can do to make sure his children have the best start they could have in life.  Incidentally, let that be a warning to you women out there who date men who say they don’t want kids, they probably don’t have very high standards.

Of course, I can see why this man sued his wife.  She lied.  She lied about her physical health and attractiveness.  Now, I’m not attracted to Asian women, but I know what ugly looks like:

This is what cosmetic surgery gets you

This is what cosmetic surgery gets you

This woman committed fraud and I feel for the poor husband here.  He obviously was looking out for the best interests of his children when he selected this woman, meanwhile she was only thinking about the best interests of herself.  This woman frankly should not have been able to reproduce because she’s the carrier of genetic refuse.  Think about it, would you want to have children with a haemophiliac, a person with Huntington’s victim or Down’s syndrome?  Of course you wouldn’t, and not because you hate the person with the disease, but because you love your future children too much to put them through such torment.  I applaud the judge’s decision here in this case, this man’s children have been afflicted in a way that will stay with them all their lives and if we give them cosmetic surgery too then this crime will only repeated itself.  I’m hoping in the near future we will see many more cases like this and more lawsuits against women who get cosmetic surgery.  Beauty is not skin deep, it’s in your genes and if you think otherwise you’re the shallow one here.

One big happy family

One big happy family

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Categories: Health, Medicine, People, Politics, Law

Author:Jason Sutherland

Resist the temptation to assume that you're always right or wrong. Never succumb to thinking you're so insignificant to trust your own thoughts and feelings. Always be responsible and listen carefully to others before passing judgement. Don't trust governments bearing stolen goods.

Subscribe to Intentious

Be notified by email whenever new pieces are posted by the blogging team tackling controversial current events or issues.

150 Comments on “Chinese Man Successfully Sues Wife for Ugly Children”

  1. October 28, 2012 at 9:54 am #

    What! She was only sued, such a crime surely warrants execution. How dare she give birth to an unloveable ugly child! It is no wonder women get plastic surgey if a father cannot see past the superficialities of appearance and love his child for who she is and not what she looks like. Perhaps we should start fining women for eyebrow waxing, hair colouring, shaving their legs, even wearing make up! What a disgrace that women would want to improve their physical appearance to attract men. Perhaps an article on the evils of men who go to the gym, shave, get haircuts and wear deodorant will follow..? Although given your recotd

    • October 28, 2012 at 9:55 am #

      …record of anti women articles I think not

    • James Hill
      October 28, 2012 at 12:57 pm #

      This is a great point. Men and women undertake all sorts of regimes to increase their attractiveness. Is it fraud if a man goes to the gym and diets religiously to counteract the effects of poor genetics? What if his kids choose not to follow a similar regime and wind up falling prey to the genes he has passed on

      It’s astounding to me that this man was able to win a fraud case against his wife on such spurious grounds, especially since having an attractive partner is by no means a guarantee that your children will grow up to be attractive. More importantly, what a horrible standard for judging others this man has set for his children.

      It is entirely appropriate that people only have intimate relationships with partners they find attractive, and there is nothing wrong with expecting your partner to take a certain level of pride in their appearance, but this man’s obsession is even more narrow than that: he’s obsessed with how this woman’s beauty is expressed genetically. What a joke. I’d much rather have a partner that is kind, intelligent, loyal and has self respect rather than someone who merely looks pretty without putting in any effort.

      • October 30, 2012 at 6:27 am #

        “Is it fraud if a man goes to the gym and diets religiously to counteract the effects of poor genetics?”

        No. Because he has earned those improvement through hard work, he didn’t just cover up his deficiencies.

        A far better parallel would be a guy who pretends to be rich, but is really poor. Alas, that woman can’t benefit much from a lawsuit.

    • October 30, 2012 at 6:24 am #

      “What a disgrace that women would want to improve their physical appearance to attract men.”

      Not a disgrace, but if you have a shread of self-respect you’ll appreciate that there is something deeply selfish about this behaviour in women. I’m not one to equate selfishness with evil like communists do, but I see it for what it is: a female grab at power over men. That’s why I have no time for sluts. I’m a man, I’m in charge and I’m not taking any shit from women.

      Call me a misogynist, I don’t give a damn, I know what I am and I know what I want.

      • October 30, 2012 at 7:27 pm #

        There is something deeply selfish in the fathers actions. He should love his children and wife no matter what they look like. Simply because they do not live up to his idea of what beauty is he has cast them away, rejected them, told them they are unlovable. What could be more selfish than that? He only wants a family if they fit his criteria, well sorry, but that is not the way family of life works.

        • October 31, 2012 at 6:26 am #

          “He should love his children and wife no matter what they look like.”

          He SHOULD do this, he SHOULD do that. You’re a fucking slave-driver. Listen to yourself, you actually believe other people OWE other people their lives. If you force someone to love you, you ain’t being loved. Why do you socialists have such a hard time understanding this? Forced compassion isn’t compassion, it’s an oppression that quickly breeds contempt.

          • James Hill
            October 31, 2012 at 8:07 am #

            Ugh, you SOCIALISTS are telling me I have to love and care for the children I bring into the world, even if they don’t live up to my expectations? This is worse than slavery. Welcome to Obama’s Amerikkka, folks.

            • October 31, 2012 at 11:33 am #

              It’s a terrifying concept isn’t it? Having to earn respect and your own way in life? It’s a good thing we have family values, a work ethic and community… oh wait, we had those, then we brought in the welfare state, so we lost our family values, community and work ethic so we’re a bunch of rude, crude and lazy white trash. You fear living in a world where you actually have to work for things. I get that. But you don’t have a choice, the welfare state is only temporary, its days are numbered. Best you use what time you have remaining to be prepared.

              • James Hill
                October 31, 2012 at 12:33 pm #

                You’re being painfully retarded. To suggest that an infant daughter needs to “earn” her father’s love (in this case, by being beautiful) is nonsensical. The problem you– and a lot of other libertarians– have is that you conflate duty and responsibilities with slavery.

                Yes, a father has duties to his children, especially when they’re too young to care for themselves, whether they’re beautiful or not. It’s insane to me that you’d blame the welfare state for eroding family values when you and your supports have advocated this man abandoning his children for being ugly. The simple truth is that your philosophy is just as poisonous as the worst Marxism has to offer. I don’t need to reach any further for an example than the ones you’ve provided in this very thread.

                You’re also being a tad inconsistent, I might add. Libertarianism is all about contracts between free individuals. Nowhere in any marriage contract I’ve seen does it make provisions for backing out of the agreement should one of the parties happen to not be genetically beautiful. One could very well make the argument that this man simply didn’t do due dilligence when entering into a contract and he was out negotiated by a smarter business partner. He then used the oppressive arm of the state to force his more adept partner to surrender earnings she earned with her supreme negotiating skills.

                • November 3, 2012 at 6:11 am #

                  Woah man, overreaction much?

                  Firstly, I was referring to his ex-wife earning his love. She never did, she tricked him into it.

                  Secondly, can you imagine how hard life is as a woman looking that ugly? That mother can, thus her daughter will hate her mother long before she hates her father. Again, empathy dude.

                  • November 3, 2012 at 12:34 pm #

                    Yeah life would’ve been quite a lot harder for that woman if she’d chosen to remain ugly… I think it’s fully her right to make herself look beautiful, through whatever means she chooses. Beauty is only skin deep after all… you can nab a guy through gorgeousness but you can only keep him through a gorgeous personality to go with it. I suspect if the husband and wife had a loving relationship, he wouldn’t be so nasty as to sue. But the fact he sued – and won – points to this not being a loving marriage. Thus… they kinda deserve each other really! haha

            • Naomi
              May 2, 2013 at 6:47 am #

              Lmao! Haha 🙂

          • October 31, 2012 at 9:55 pm #

            I hardly think expecting a father to love his daughter is being a slave driver or forced love or forced compassion – get some perspective!

          • Trista
            February 8, 2013 at 3:42 am #

            That’s very true Jason, but if it was you and if that wife of yours which you thought to be the most beautiful and preety and you want your offspring to be beautiful, then you would think otherwise. This man has been “scammed” that’s all. If you been lied to and was tricked, I am pretty sure you would hate your wife too!!

          • wil
            May 24, 2013 at 5:08 am #

            So if your children are ugly, then you won’t love them? If your children don’t do well in school you won’t love them? If they don’t fit your criteria, you won’t love them? Life changes. One day you won’t be as “glorious” as you find yourself now and then you’ll probably find yourself truly being honest. Aging comes, death comes, and one day you will surely wish people to love you despite your conditions. Death breaks all pride and arrogance my friend. No one can escape it.

            I wonder what Einsteins’ parent thought when he wasn’t doing so hot in grade school.

        • November 1, 2012 at 1:20 pm #

          I think the issue here is with courts agreeing to treat a marriage like a business arrangement. This is definitely from all reports a valid way to treat a marriage in Asian countries (India included, etc). Not so sure this guy would have won such a suit filed in Australia or America… hmmm. But in a nation where you marry for inheritance/business reasons moreso than for love… this is a valid thing to sue for. As for guys at the gym: that is working your body within the confines of your genetics. It’s different here… to be on equal footing he’d theoretically have to pay for plastic surgery for all his kids lest they be destined for poor selection throughout their communist lives.

          • James Hill
            November 1, 2012 at 7:24 pm #

            I don’t think it is meaningfully different. Your genes are your genes and someone predisposed to obesity will likely pass those genes on no matter how hard he himself trains. You can make the argument that a father like that will pass on good habits and education for his children, but a mother that undergoes extensive beauty regimes or surgery would be able to pass on the know how and resources to do the same for her children.

            Treating marriage like a business arrangement is the logical conclusion of secular, state sponsored marriage. From the government’s point of view, what else can it be? The notion of marriage as a sacred union between two people that is for life, to the exclusion of all others is a deeply conservative one. For the most part it’s dead in the west. People get married for the wrong reasons, and with no community pressure forcing couples to work through their problems, their marriages are over within a few years.

          • November 2, 2012 at 8:15 am #

            That’s a gross generalisation on Asia and India – I’m sure many people who marry in those countries do so for love!

            • November 2, 2012 at 11:11 am #

              Yeah but the courts have to go with the gross generalisation in order to come to the conclusion that this was essentially a betrayal that deserves financial reimbursement. Also the issue of whether this affected his love for his wife or children is not discussed, it seems to be all about the underlying issue of success, family image, informed choice to further the futures of the family, very much business like drivers as to why suing is valid.

            • November 3, 2012 at 5:50 am #

              lol, it’s a generalisation so it can’t be true. You know people are waking up to this rhetorical trick.

            • December 26, 2012 at 12:38 pm #

              Believe me friend people in our part of the world (Asia) are also pretty shocked with this news. It is also in our culture’s ideal that marriage should be based on love above everything else.

      • January 31, 2013 at 7:21 pm #

        I can hardly contain the disgust I feel at your sentiments. I mean beyond the idea that you’re looking for a female counterpart (and it’s no wonder that you’re still looking) based on how she’s going to benefit you and yours, you completely disregard a human’s natural desire to be desirable. What diet and exercise fix having a face with blatantly unattractive features? I don’t think there are any. Apparently your definition of what it means to be a person is reproduction, I assure you that even in the most subjective of philosophies, it remains happiness. These women should forgo their happiness because you feel that you’re being lied to?

        With your hard work comparison, she probably needed to work hard for the funds for plastic surgery, especially in China, yet you award a higher standard to the man at the gym.

        How, I ask, is it that we should deplore women for wanting to look good when they live in a society full of superficial trash like yourself who judge them based on the very thing that you condemn them for attempting to fix? It’s cultural standards set up by members of dominant cultural groups that create the ideals which these women are trying to live up to. NOT the women themselves, they have simply fallen victim to enculturation in a misogynistic world. “Women should not lie about their attractiveness, so that I can judge them on that before I worry about who they are as a human being or how well we would work as a couple.” Maybe men like you should learn to value human beings for who they are on the inside, rather than labeling unattractive people genetically weak. (As the sole basis for you comment on their bad genetics, and lack of reproductive success was in their physical appearance.) Alas, we all know that this isn’t entirely possible, because for a romantic relationship to work, there must be at least some degree of physical attraction between the pair. Perhaps there could be some happy medium, I don’t know, say, people trying to improve their physical appearance?

        Regrettably, unlike this unfortunate woman’s face, stupidity is not something that’s easily remedied, and these words gained through years of cultural study will remain lost on one such as yourself.

      • jacob
        May 1, 2013 at 3:09 am #

        …and if he had a shred of respect for his children he wouldn’t sue over their “ugliness”.

    • chonzom
      November 1, 2012 at 2:18 pm #

      Sometimes man ask women to have all these. There are man who like women in makeup!! But plastic surgery is extreme only affluent people can only think of!!

  2. October 28, 2012 at 12:39 pm #

    So, following your line of thinking, plastic surgery is tantamount to fraud and women should not be so obsessed about their looks – yet, the father in this case is so repulsed by his own daughters appearance that he is willing to sue the mother (his wife, who he supposedly loves) for producing such a grotesque child.

    Now, who in this case is more responsible if the daughters self esteem is crushed and she one day chooses to have plastic surgery? Her mother, who has had some work done, or her father who cannot bring himself to love her for who she is inside and is such a shallow and superficial prick that he is has sued her mother?

    By the way, have we seen a picture of the father, did he come second to Bradley Cooper as sexiest man in the world? Perhaps he had something to do with her supposed awful looks rather than the mother?

    Why don’t you write an article about the father and how he is reinforcing the view that women should be physically attractive first and everything else is secondary? Oh, but no, it’s all the women’s fault…yet again.

    • October 30, 2012 at 6:34 am #

      “plastic surgery is tantamount to fraud and women should not be so obsessed about their looks”

      First point is almost correct, but you missed the part about being dishonest to her husband. I’m sure there’s something in the marriage oath about honesty there… and the second point is redundant. Women are genetically hardwired to be obsessed about their looks. You can’t change nature unless you want to forced procreation with the rare mutant women who seriously don’t notice their appearance.

      I think you need to work on your empathy here. You keep forgetting that this man is a human being. The aspect that upsets this man isn’t his daughter’s ugliness, it’s the betrayal of his spouse and poisoning of his bloodline. These are huge deals for any man with self-respect and women are the first to acknowledge that a man who doesn’t give a shit about who he reproduces with are scum without standards. This man has standards and he was wronged and you have no right to demand that he just take it on the chin. This woman is a criminal.

      “Why don’t you write an article about the father and how he is reinforcing the view that women should be physically attractive first and everything else is secondary?”

      I’m pretty sure I just did that with this piece… Why are you stating the obvious? Trouble reading? My only caveate is that health is more important than attractiveness and while the two aren’t the same, they are closely related. Consider how ugly people look when they’re sick, we’re genetically programmed to see sickness as ugly.

      • October 30, 2012 at 7:24 pm #

        Genetically hardwired? To be obsessed? What is that claim based on? I think a more accurate term might be ‘socially tuned’ to being obsessed about their looks, as they are by popular culture and superficial men (eg, the husband in this case). Clearly he would not have married her as she looked before her plastic surgery, so what message does that send? That women (and their offspring) are only valuable if they are physically attractive and forget the inner qualities.

        I need to work on my empathy? The man is a human being – yes, though a selfish, uncaring and superficial one. What kind of message has he sent his daughter and the rest of his family? It is clear now he was only with his wife because of her good looks and not because of any deeper reasons. Poisoning his bloodlines? Sounds like Germany circa 1936. How can you be so sure his bloodlines are so pure? Is he a Nobel prize winner, a Booker prize winner, a genius medical scientist? Are bloodlines only about good looks? What about inner qualities? Just because someone is physically attractive it does not necessarily follow that they will be nice people. Perhaps this father should work on his inner qualities if he wants to remain having supposedly pure bloodlines.

        The woman is not a criminal. Plastic surgery is legal and now a normal part of society, whatever your warped view on it being some kind of fraud. While she did not tell her husband and that is certainly deceitful, that an issue for them to sort out. If everyone who broke the ‘honesty’ element of marriage vows was a criminal, there would not be many free men or women around.

        • October 31, 2012 at 6:32 am #

          “Genetically hardwired? To be obsessed? What is that claim based on?”

          Dude, what fucking planet do you live on? What the fuck do women do all around the world? They doll themselves up in front of mirrors and buy clothes. Furthermore, they do this as often as any man’s hobby with cars, computer games, electronics, collecting etc… and they spend MORE money on these things than men do. You can demand that I send you along a peer-reviewed paper about this behaviour in women, but it makes you look stupid because it’s the equivalent of demanding a peer-reviewed paper on what colour the sky actually is.

          You socialists are obsessed with ideologies and Hegelian interpretations of reality. Seriously, open your eyes and look at the world around you for yourself. Forget the books and idealogies they keep trying to force into your brain, just look at the world for yourself and think about it so you can draw your own conclusions.

          • October 31, 2012 at 9:59 pm #

            Women all around the world do a lot more than simply pour over themselves in front of the mirror and buy clothes – what a simple view of females you have. Please do send me this ‘peer reviewed paper,’ I would love to read it. Again with the socialist comments, where did that come from? For the record my eyes are open and I do draw my own conclusions on the world and my conclusion is that it is not too much for a man to love his daughter.

            • November 3, 2012 at 5:56 am #

              Ummm, dude with his eyes open, re-read what I wrote because you’re showing the distinct signs of illiteracy.

              • November 3, 2012 at 5:10 pm #

                still waiting for that peer reviewed essay…

                • November 3, 2012 at 6:56 pm #

                  *facepalm*

                  • November 4, 2012 at 5:04 pm #

                    ‘You can demand that I send you along a peer-reviewed paper about this behaviour in women…’ – bluff called, you’re even more full of shit than I suspected…

                    • Jimbo
                      November 4, 2012 at 8:02 pm #

                      “You can demand that I send you along a peer-reviewed paper about this behaviour in women, but it makes you look stupid because it’s the equivalent of demanding a peer-reviewed paper on what colour the sky actually is.”

                      Sorry stublogs, it may be a clumsily written paragraph but you seem to have read only the first sentence and then chosen to ignore the rest of Jason’s oh so obvious sarcasm.

                    • November 5, 2012 at 8:26 am #

                      oh so obvious sarcasm? I think Jason needs to get some writing lessons…

                    • November 4, 2012 at 8:53 pm #

                      I love your arrogance, illustrated by the fact that you made a mistake and kept your head so far up your arse in denial that you didn’t bother once to go back and actually re-read what I wrote. I mean, I hope it’s just arrogance and you’re not actually that mentally deficient.

                      My sentence is grammatically sound, but in retrospect it would have been better if I’d used the subjunctive case. Oh and every woman I’ve asked has told me the essentially the same thing, “women being obsessively pre-occupied with their appearance is just common sense.”

                      You clearly lack common sense. I suggest you go get that looked at before your arrogance gets you killed.

                    • November 5, 2012 at 8:29 am #

                      so what you’re saying is that there is no evidence other than hearsay to back up your opinions, gotcha 😉

                    • November 9, 2012 at 8:04 am #

                      Hearsay, yeah sure, if it’s only hearsay that the sky is blue.

          • Anonymous
            December 7, 2012 at 7:31 pm #

            What planet do you live on? Because it’s clearly not the same one as us women. I’m going to take a shot in the dark and say that you either deliberately surround yourself with only a certain type of women, or attract only a certain type of woman. I think you need to check the color of the sky yourself. Or shall I send you a peer-review paper on the behaviour of the millions and millions of real woman on the planet that don’t fit this stereotype, either because they don’t care about hair/make-up/ etc at all (Hello tomboys! And slobs, too.) or don’t care about it beyond basic personal grooming and looking reasonably decent. Or, I guess, getting plastic surgery because people have treated you like shit your whole life for not being “pretty”. Nothing wrong with the girly-girl gals, but man…. Perhaps you just dón’t know what color the sky is beyong some narrow little bubble world. .

      • Georgiana
        November 10, 2012 at 11:38 pm #

        “Women are genetically hardwired to be obsessed about their looks”

        What about the fact that more and more men spend a lot of time in the mirror to fix their mohawk, or whatever? What about men who wear earrings (depending on the fad), or bracelets? From what I know, unless they were part of a tribe, our fathers and grandfathers considered that being a “girl thing”. What about men who use cosmetics – facial and hand creams, or hydra energetic eye roll-on – or makeup when they go to the the club, or just on everyday basis? You should check out tutorials on youtube of boys showing other boys how to use mascara, concealer, foundation, eyeliner and so on. What about men who wax their very hairy parts, or men how pluck their eyebrows, or men who use transparent nail polish? What about men who do cosmetic/plastic surgery? Ever heard of words like metrosexual, or retrosexual? What about men who get obsessed with going to the gym because they don’t look buff enough (therefore not attractive enough)? Oh, and what about male models? And I could go on and on with the list…

        I guess nobody told all those men they are not “genetically hardwired to be obsessed about their looks”. Newsflash! Whether you’re a man or a woman, as long as you have genitalia and want to have sex, you’ll always care about looks. And if you happen to have an enhanced aesthetic sense and want to look your best, you’ll spend more time in the mirror than the average folk, no matter the gender. Take a look around you, men and women constantly change the “ideal” of how they are supposed to look and what roles they are supposed to play. And if the cosmetic industry is keen on selling products to men, they will make everything possible (from advertising to PR) to change the way men look at themselves. The next thing you know, you’ll be wearing face masks because your T-zone is too oily or whatever. Oh, and those wrinkles… so unattractive! Here, have a cream.

        By the way, wikipedia tells me:

        genotype (G) + environment (E) + genotype & environment interactions (GE) → phenotype (P)

        “A phenotype is the composite of an organism’s observable characteristics or traits, such as its morphology, development, biochemical or physiological properties, phenology, behavior, and products of behavior. Phenotypes result from the expression of an organism’s genes as well as the influence of environmental factors and the interactions between the two.”

        So before saying that “Women are genetically hardwired to be obsessed about their looks”, I think we should take a moment, breath in, breath out, use our brains, do some good, thorough research using science, not pseudoscience, and distinguish between what genes make us do, and what society makes us do with the behaviours it imposes upon us. Prejudice much?

        By the way, someone should really tell all those lower class, working women that they are “genetically hardwired to be obsessed about their looks”, so they should wear some more makeup, or just some makeup, and spend more time in front of a mirror. (Maybe David Beckham or Cristiano Ronaldo could teach them a thing or two). And some of them really need to be introduced to things like soap and deodorant. I’m just saying. Genes don’t seem to “speak” loudly enough for them, right?

      • Anonymous
        May 1, 2013 at 12:13 pm #

        It is so interesting to hear the words of a man with a small penis. So enlightening! I would say, “try men” but then again I don’t think the gay community would take you on principle. 😉

  3. Kathi
    October 28, 2012 at 7:08 pm #

    What I see is a familiy picture with a happily smiling baby boy in the center. He does not know what his reproducer (because ‘father’ is the inadequate word here I think) did to this children and poor woman.
    How sad is this – the older boy and the girl must feel so unwanted and dismissed!
    That is not a father – he is a monster without soul!
    If someone puts beauty beyond everything else and all the fine inner qualities does not matter in this case he does not deserve to have children.
    He should get plants instead – that would be better for mankind.
    Because obviously in his genes we will find a load of bad psychological characteristics that he will or has passed on to the offspring (just to go back to the genetical aspect).
    Choosing the right partner is a process that gets initiated by the woman (Yes pals – I am just referring to current literature). So this woman chose the wrong partner.

    I think it is very dangerous to eqal beauty with health!

    For example – an organically grown apple can be ugly but the scars and marks and asymmetry are signs for the raw healthy status! It tastes better, it is safe to eat.
    Sadly most of the consumers want beautiful apples – that can only be reached by the usage of poisonous repellants and waxing after harvest. But these products are not healthy – that is the price you have to pay for a flawless product.

    As a doctor I work with patients of all sizes, beauties (or not) and health constitutions.
    What I can say is – beauty and health can come together but a chronic disease or a genetic defect can happen any time to anyone – choosing a beautiful partner cannot guarantee health for a life period.

    Sueing someone for trying to catch up with the spirit of our time and sentences like that above shows how f*cked up our society is!

    • October 30, 2012 at 6:38 am #

      All of these arguments boil down to, “He’s a man, he should have just taken this insult on the chin and let her off the hook because you mustn’t ever hold woman to account for their actions.”

      • Tom M
        November 3, 2012 at 4:55 am #

        Jason, it just boil down to you being a dumb fuck so shut your repuke’s mouth you piece of garbage!!!

        • November 3, 2012 at 5:48 am #

          Hohoho! Such wit!

          Every time it comes down to pointless insults against me I chuckle because it tells me you’ve got no argument… And no brain.

  4. October 28, 2012 at 10:33 pm #

    This man was well within his rights to both divorce that woman and sue her. I also hope he gets to be free and clear of that child, too. Ultimately, every time he looks at his child he will think of the massive fraud the mother perpetuated on him.

    I can’t help but think that you all grandly miss the point. The point is not that she had surgery to improve her admittedly terrible appearance. The POINT is that she knowingly DID NOT tell him of this all through the courting phase or the marriage. If she wanted to have surgery that’s fine but she damn well should have been decent enough to tell someone she was planning on having children with so that he could make an informed decision. This is all her own damn fault since with some honesty she could have found someone who would have consented to a relationship with her with all their facts straight.

    • James Hill
      October 29, 2012 at 8:58 am #

      You do have a good point here: she should have been honest with him before she got married. I’d have no problems with him divorcing her because she wasn’t honest with him, he’s well within his rights to do that. It’s another thing entirely to put his children through so much trauma by suing his wife for fraud because they’re so ugly. How horrible those poor children must feel over something that totally is not their fault.

      If he looks at his children and all he sees is an ugly fraud, there’s something wrong with him. They’re his flesh and blood and they look to him for love, support and protection. If he can’t get past their physical appearance– never mind his former wife’s– he’s vain to the point of being a sociopath.

      • October 30, 2012 at 6:39 am #

        I see you’re still peddling slavery.

        • James Hill
          October 30, 2012 at 8:34 am #

          You see the bonds of family, the responsibility for a father to his children to be slavery? Your libertarianism is selfishness on steroids.

          • October 30, 2012 at 9:53 pm #

            When he was tricked into it by deception, yes. When you force people to stay with their family it ain’t love. Derr…

            If you want loving families, they need to be forged with a bond freely and knowlingly entered into by both parties. Otherwise, yes, it’s slavery.

            • Anon
              May 1, 2013 at 10:09 am #

              A child does not “knowingly enter” into a family.

        • ashley johnson
          February 7, 2013 at 9:20 am #

          It should be illegal for this dumb Fuck jason to reproduce. If he ever has kids, he should be sued for being an immature, shallow, unfit father.

          • February 7, 2013 at 10:05 am #

            Does it scare you to think that many women actually want to reproduce with men like me, but not with women like you? Also that looking at current birth rates, your kind (non-traditionalists) will become a tiny minority in the future because you’re infertile due to emotional immaturity?

            Probably not, you’re too full of yourself to notice the rest of the world I’m sure.

      • November 4, 2012 at 12:12 am #

        “You have a good point” followed by ‘but my feeling don’t agree’!

        And also, he has ONE child. The children in the photo above is just to illustrate the authors point not show that he continued to have babies with this woman then left her.

        • James Hill
          November 5, 2012 at 10:38 am #

          It was more like “you’ve made a point I agree with, but here is where you and I still disagree.”
          If he only has one child, than the photo of him and his family being shopped around is inaccurate, as that shows three children in the image. Other sites reporting on this story have used the same image as being allegedly of the mother and father.
          My point still stands whether he has one child or a thousand, to you it’s irrelevant how many children they are because he has the right to abandon them for being ugly.

    • Evelyn
      October 30, 2012 at 3:53 pm #

      Exactly Tamiko thank you!

      I think most commenters are missing the main point: which is this woman has been DISHONEST to her husband. she went on through the courtship and marriage without ever telling him what she really looked like. he only became aware of that when the children popped out and looked nothing like him or the wife! whether he would have liked her if he had known her real features or not is another story altogether. so on those grounds, he had every right to sue her for fraud and divorce her, because thats what she is: a fraud!

      and all these fallacious comments about the guy looking at his child and thinking they are ugly etc, what the heck did all that come from? and it’s hilarious that people who are calling him out for being a superficial jerk would also be the same people who wouldnt marry or breed, let alone date someone who looks like that. some people tend to select mates who have good genes in every sense of the word: skin deep qualities AND looks. so that such genes have a higher chance of being passed on to their offspring. i see nothing wrong with holding that point of view. from an evolutionary standpoint, i would want to select and mate with an alpha man (looks and qualities) than a beta male so that there’s a higher chance my babies would come out looking better and behaving better than the average population; and thus having a higher chance of survival in society.

      • James Hill
        October 30, 2012 at 5:00 pm #

        Evelyn, we got the “fallacious arguments” from the very article we’re talking about, linked in the first line of Jason’s post:

        “Jian Feng, living in Northern China, has filed for divorce from his wife after he found their newborn child to be “incredibly ugly,” arguing that his wife tricked him into the union by appearing to be a beautiful woman when she was instead ugly.

        “I married my wife out of love, but as soon as we had our first daughter, we began having marital issues. Our daughter was incredibly ugly, to the point where it horrified me,” reports gossipwelove.com”

        I find it helps for me to form an opinion AFTER I’ve read the facts.

        • November 4, 2012 at 12:09 am #

          After you’ve read the facts, huh? From what I’ve read on this story the marital problems after the daughter was born stemmed from the fact that since the child looked nothing like him or what he thought his wife looked like he thought she had cheated on him initially. Obviously, the majority of people are going to respond like you and your comrades here so that’s how the articles are going to be written…with the man as the bad guy and that fraud wife of his as the victim.

          What this woman did was just as bad, no worse, than a man having gender re-assignment surgery and fucking straight men without telling them so they could make an informed decision. But from the tone of your arguments I guess you’d all be okay with that since it’s not your place to judge.

          • James Hill
            November 5, 2012 at 10:47 am #

            What part of my analysis was not factual? You seem to spend a lot of time crying about how dishonest she was for tricking him with plastic surgery, but I’ve already agreed with you that he is within his rights to divorce her because she was deceptive. But you seem to feel he should be able to take things further and totally abandon all fatherly responsibilities. How is it his daughter’s fault that he didn’t do due dilligence before entering into a marriage contract? How does that absolve him of the duties expected of all parents in society?

            • Jimbo
              November 5, 2012 at 11:35 am #

              Agreed. Both parents in this article are truly awful amoral people. At what point however does it become ok for a father to abandon and treat his children in such a way? The children in this situation are the real victims. The father was indeed wronged. His actions have since condemned him in the truth of his character. I just can not understand why some still choose to support his actions.

            • November 7, 2012 at 7:59 am #

              Because you talk about being factual but I don’t know how you know he abandoned his children. For all you know he is paying for their plastic surgery, education, housing, food and might even be raising them. How do you know he isn’t doing these things? You have leaped to a conclusion that he has abandoned them and than complained about factuality.

              • James Hill
                November 7, 2012 at 9:53 am #

                No, the talk about “abandoning” his children is in response to a comment make by Tamiko, which you seemed to agree with (and haven’t actually explicitly stated you don’t agree with). I also stated that it was incredibly callous to go on record in the international media as having said the source of his marital problems was how ugly his child was/

                • November 9, 2012 at 8:07 am #

                  So if I don’t explicitly disagree with what someone else writes I automatically believe the same things that they do? Fuck man… I hope you’re not going to be in charge of the thought crimes bureau once it’s official.

                  • James Hill
                    November 12, 2012 at 6:57 pm #

                    No, I questioned you on this issue a few times. You responded to Stu’s point about him abandoning his wife and children with the line
                    “He SHOULD do this, he SHOULD do that. You’re a fucking slave-driver. Listen to yourself, you actually believe other people OWE other people their lives. If you force someone to love you, you ain’t being loved.”

                    I took this at the time to mean you feel that a father doesn’t have a moral obligation to love and support his children. Having reread your previous statements, I can see there’s room for ambiguity in what you said.

                    So, are we in agreement? Despite the issues between husband and wife, this man has a moral duty to love and support his children– both emotionally and financially– no matter what they look like?

              • Jimbo
                November 7, 2012 at 5:17 pm #

                What about the emotional abandonment?

                Now you seem to be just arguing semantics.

                • November 9, 2012 at 8:10 am #

                  The word “semantics” by itself isn’t an argument. Especially since we’re arguing about the factually of the case. Did her abandon his children emotionally? His remarks are insufficient evidence by themselves to conclude one way or the other. It is merely your assumption that he did, but by all means, if you can provide additional evidence outside the source article on this case, I will agree.

                  • Jimbo
                    November 9, 2012 at 12:49 pm #

                    Correct my reference to “semantics” was quite obviously an observation rather than an argument of any kind.

                    If you can not see how the fathers actions are completely devoid of any consideration for his children’s feelings… Then I can’t help you.
                    Such emotionally crippling rejection setting them up for a lifetime of misery. Seems like emotional abandonment to me. Another observation if you need some clarification.

                    I’m sure the children will fully appreciate the factual aspects of the case in time. *sarcasm*

              • November 8, 2012 at 8:30 am #

                If he’s still supporting that kid then he’s a fool. I hope he did abandon the kid since the child is for all intents and purposes a product of rape by deception…or does that not apply when it’s a woman being deceitful? It’s why I assumed he abandoned the whole mess.

                • November 9, 2012 at 8:21 am #

                  I almost agree. Upon reflection he should either:

                  1. Be allowed to divorce and release himself, if he wants to, of fatherly obligations to the children, however, suing his ex-wife was a bit excessive and should be considered too far in this case.

                  OR

                  2. Be allowed to divorce, sue his wife, but be obligated to raise his children.

                  People who think this is harsh need to remember that this woman effectively destroyed his hopes and dreams for the future and/or left him with a huge plastic surgery bill to pay for his children. What if she had Huntington’s disease and kept that secret until she was dying? She could have effectively sentenced all of children to a death sentence and forced him to watch them all die.

                  Genetics are very important. They make us who we are, to dismiss them is actually very shallow.

                • Anonymous
                  December 1, 2012 at 5:01 am #

                  Please don’t use the word “rape” so frivolously. It’s a very ugly thing to do. Deception, fine. But he was not held down, BRUTALIZED, and *FORCED* or coerced to have sex. That is rape, for a man or woman.
                  Think of it this way if you must – if a woman has sex with a man, and then finds out something about him after that she doesn’t like, was she “raped”?

      • October 30, 2012 at 7:34 pm #

        evelyn – thanks for the assumption about who I would marry, breed with and date…

        echoing James’ comment that our ‘fallacious arguments’ are actually based on the article cited.

        • October 30, 2012 at 8:11 pm #

          I like how women are wise and discerning creatures of beauty when they agree with you, but when two women here disagree with you then they’re ignorant and bigoted.

          I get that you’re trying to be a nice guy to women. However, the only difference between a nice guy and a pick-up artist is that the pick-up artist has actually read at least one book about women.

          • October 31, 2012 at 10:09 pm #

            Well she is ignorant because she plainly missed a key part of the article, though I don’t know where you drew the bigoted part from… and for the record, I prefer to base my experience and opinions on women through my life experiences rather than what I read in books or ‘peer reviewed’ essays.

            • November 3, 2012 at 6:02 am #

              Your ‘life experiences’ eh?

              I humiliate feminists all the time, and yet all I need do is snap my fingers and my woman will serve me. Because she wants to. Enjoy your equality mate.

              Women really respect men who see themselves as equals to them!! Lol!

              • Anonymous
                December 1, 2012 at 4:42 am #

                err…your wife in particular having an extremely submissive personality doesn’t mean anything about women in general. Or the “feminists” you “argue” with. Or you, other than you’re the kind of guy who snaps his fingers at people and expects to be served. Which actually does say a lot about you, on second thought. Some men like to have women literally shit on them. Not something that tends to extrapolate accurately to the general poulation of men, I’m afraid.

              • ashley johnson
                February 7, 2013 at 10:00 am #

                I highly doubt you have a woman.

  5. M
    November 1, 2012 at 11:40 am #

    I’m sorry but this guy is an idiot. If he would have bothered to look at his wife’s childhood photos then he would have seen what was to come lol. But I’m guessing he didn’t bother to get to know her and married her off of her looks, which is why he got his panties in a bunch when their child didn’t come out looking like a supermodel. I feel bad that the wife lost the case to this superficial prick, but I’m happy for her that they are getting the divorce because he is definitely not a keeper. I hope he didn’t have her sign a pre-nup and that she walks away with half of everything he’s got :))

    • November 3, 2012 at 5:53 am #

      I think you made a good point about him being superficial, he clearly was in love with his wife to begin with. But being a shallow prick doesn’t negate what she did to him and his children.

  6. November 2, 2012 at 12:27 pm #

    stupid article…

  7. November 3, 2012 at 12:51 am #

    Who is her doctor? … i am now a fan of her doctor!

  8. November 7, 2012 at 8:04 am #

    I don’t see why the wife should have to tell him that she had plastic surgery to begin with. He said he married for love. Now we all see his love is love of her looks to pass on through genetic inheritance rather than her smarts, heart, and love for him. (Not saying that I know if she even really loved him or not.) I am sure that she is much better off without him in her life, no matter the amount of money he may have. Plenty of “ugly” people are successful and smart, even save your life, and can become beautiful on the outside through manipulation using the latest technology in cosmetics. Who knows, maybe one day we can manipulate our genes to program our children to be what we consider “beautiful.”

  9. Georgiana
    November 10, 2012 at 11:24 am #

    This whole article amuses me terribly.

    My father always told me how when I was born I looked “as ugly as a monkey, having black fluffs of hair even on my ears” and how he didn’t like me at all. But then, as he told me, “I started growing more and more beautiful and adorable”, and the more beautiful I became, the more his paternal love grew. Pathetic! Need I add that he’s the alpha male type?

    I don’t want to generalise here, but in my opinion and little experience, the alpha male type I’ve seen tend to be superficial creatures for whom looks are extremely important and who can’t seem to get over the fact that yes, maybe the woman doesn’t look like his perfect ideal (whatever that might mean), but has other, personality related, qualities.

    Also, Mr. Jason Sutherland, you say “women clearly are the biggest sexual objectifiers of their bodies” and then you go on and say “This woman frankly should not have been able to reproduce because she’s the carrier of genetic refuse. “ (Why, because she’s ugly? Now I understand why a lot of girls say that only being pretty gets them being loved.) and “A good parent wants their children to be healthy, attractive…” And if they are not, then what? Parents, friends, mass-media, cosmetic industry, tells them, more or less in these terms “Girl, you ugly, you need to do something about it, otherwise you won’t have success , boys won’t like you, nobody’s gonna want to have sex with you, you won’t be loved” and then shows them the steps to becoming more beautiful. All this puts a pressure on girls to look a certain way, to be beautiful in a way that society defines as being beautiful, from the beginning of their childhood!! (if we look at the Barbie dolls we – girls – are given, and cartoon characters that look like a Barbie doll, and who marry the beautiful, Ken like prince. A funny video to go with my point http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rT28Z0xM88 )

    “For me as a man, I look at a woman’s body and her features to guage how healthy she is physically and if she would produce good children for me…” So for you, falling in love doesn’t just happen? Assuming that “guage” is accidentally misspelled, when, in fact, you wanted to say “gauge”, do you mean to say you choose your women consciously, and not subconsciously? So how does it work? Do you say to yourself: “Wow, look at the hips that woman has! Just enough fat on the right places (boobs, ass, hips). Oh, and yes, her face’s symmetry is good enough. Her features are pretty harmonic so I think she’ll give me attractive kids. But I better check out her parents, coz maybe she inherits her mom’s good looks, and her dad might look like a troll! Next stop, submit her to an IQ test, and if she scores around 110, then she’s pretty much good to go.”
    If so, then that, my dear sir, is called objectifying (though I’ve never heard a man making it a matter of rational choice before), and it’s one of the main reasons so many women out there feel the need to be “the biggest sexual objectifiers of their bodies” – because they know they are looked at, judged firstly by the way they look, and if they don’t meet the requirements, they won’t get the change to show how beautiful they are on the inside.

  10. Anonymous
    December 1, 2012 at 4:33 am #

    Ahahahaha! You actually think you can tell how healthy a woman is, or what kind of genes she will pass on to her child, based on how “attractive” she is on the outside? OMG, that was a good laugh for the day. And, completely ignoring that mothering skills are unrelated to attractiveness, to boot. Ahhh…that was fun. Now, to address the other points you bring up….Ahahahaha! Oh, god, sorry, it’s just impossible… So, was your own mother the one who passed on the “too retarded to put any string of logic or common sense together” gene to you?

  11. Anonymous
    December 13, 2012 at 7:13 pm #

    Was this article written as a joke? Or is the writer just a complete douche bag? I can’t tell, help!

  12. December 21, 2012 at 8:36 pm #

    oh my fucking god the only reason women get plastic surgery in asia is not because of them self its the men they push the women and because they aren’t what they think is ‘beauty’ i mean this article is sad, the kids should be loved not disowned because they are ‘unattractive’ and its their own father.

    • December 22, 2012 at 3:10 pm #

      Isn’t this the perception everywhere, not just in Asia?

  13. Laura
    December 25, 2012 at 3:44 am #

    My goodness Jason….I am shocked you haven’t sued your parents for the ugly genes you received.

    • James Hill
      January 30, 2013 at 2:16 pm #

      Of all the hateposts Jason has received over the last few months, this is easily the funniest

  14. L
    December 25, 2012 at 3:57 am #

    Someone who is born naturally beautiful who mates with someone equally as beautiful can have one hell of an ugly child! Two of the Peoples hottest celebrities are a great example. Have you seen the biological children of Brad Pitt and Fat lips Jolie? They aren’t anywhere near the prettiest kids I have ever seen…FAR from it. No they aren’t scarred or hideous but I can think of at least 10 babies from friends who aren’t a 10 on the national rating scale who made MUCH better looking children then the Jolie-Pitts. But you know what? They love their children, and the children don’t have to look gorgeous to earn that love. You should go take a gander at Jennifer Aniston’s Mother. That woman did not fall from the sexy tree all those years ago but hot damn her daughter is good looking. Perhaps it was from his side of the pool the kids retained the ugly gene because I look at some ugly parents kids and they turn out pretty darn good.

    Regardless of that, this lawsuit is ridiculous and I feel for those children and what they will live with throughout their years and how much of a downfall their self esteem will take. Bet they will have plastic surgery to make themselves feel better and good for them! Its not about what other people thing about you, if you want to feel good and surgery will make you do so go for it. Perhaps she could have mentioned she had some work done but if he is that vain, fuck him. He doesn’t deserve anything on the inside of her if he can’t get past the outside. Fucking pig.

  15. Chrystal105
    December 25, 2012 at 4:01 am #

    And so he felt he should sue after three kids with her ranging largely in age… doesn’t make sense.

    Also now that he has sued successfuly, that just told each of those innocent kids they are ugly… what the hell kind of message is that? Hope those kids grow up and sue their father for the mental anguish this whole fiasco had caused.

  16. Anonymous
    December 25, 2012 at 5:12 am #

    “Think about it, would you want to have children with a haemophiliac, a person with Huntington’s victim or Down’s syndrome? Of course you wouldn’t, and not because you hate the person with the disease, but because you love your future children too much to put them through such torment.”

    A little education would go a long way for ignorant people such as Jason. As the mother of a child with Down Syndrome (Down, not Down’s), I assure you that this is NOT a disease! The fact that you are saying that those with a genetic disorder or may produce a child with a genetic disorder shouldn’t reproduce makes me want to punch you in the face. With all of the screenings during pregnancy, there was nothing that indicated that I may be carrying a child with Down Syndrome. There is no history of it in my family, nor am I in the age group where it is more common. As far as we were concerned, we were a healthy couple expecting a beautiful baby boy.

    There is so much crap in your article, but I understand that you are playing devil’s advocate and it may not necessarily be your views. But to start bringing in those with genetic disorders and start degrading those and their parents, I just have to say that I feel sorry for you. It is people as ignorant and screwed up as you that are the ones who shouldn’e be allowed to reproduce.

    • James Hill
      January 30, 2013 at 2:20 pm #

      Can your child live on his or her own without care and medical assistance? Are there opportunities denied to your child because of limitations Down syndrome places on them? Having a disease in no way robs a person of their dignity or their individuality, but let’s be realistic. If have a genetic disease and if my kids wound up having it i’d love them all the same, but if there’s any reasonable way to spare them the pain of growing up with it, I most certainly would.

  17. Catherine
    January 2, 2013 at 9:53 am #

    Jason. This initially made me laugh. But then I started to realize what a piece of shit you must truly be. Women are doing this for you. Sad and pathetic as it is. You suck. Then again, I’m sure you like this sorta banter.

    • February 3, 2013 at 8:59 am #

      “Women are doing this for you.”

      Excuse? Women are making themselve look beautiful for me? Are you telling me that women are selfless creatures who never try to exploit men’s tendancy to be visual aroused by them to get away with theft, immaturity, dishonesty and laziness? Because if that’s true, then women should be giving me their money instead of spending it on clothes, make-up and cosmetic surgery because it’ll make me a damn sight happier than having to listen to them complain about how hard their lives are.

  18. anthony
    January 7, 2013 at 3:14 am #

    Any fakeness needs to be rooted out. Both of them are guilty. The guy im sure, is guilty of being fake in business and screwing people over just like his modified wife did to him. It’s a case of karma coming back to those who earn it. And this china-man must have done some really ugly screwing of people over. It’s a horror. You must bow down to the Gods of balance.

    • February 3, 2013 at 9:00 am #

      Honestly, I think this guy was never in love with this woman. He purchased her to procreate with for his legacy. If he was in love with her, then he would have wanted to know all about her, including her childhood. That said, I don’t believe we have a right to judge another person on their personal standards. To say that everyone should only marry for love is dangerously totalitarian.

  19. Carol
    January 19, 2013 at 1:00 pm #

    You r an asshole and very very ignorant

    • February 3, 2013 at 9:02 am #

      Thank you for admitting through insults and the absence of arguments that I made a sound point. If it rattles you, congratulations, you’re alive and feeling something!

  20. Leslie
    January 30, 2013 at 5:40 am #

    this isn’t a mature response, but fuck you dude.

    • February 3, 2013 at 9:02 am #

      Thank you for admitting through insults and the absence of arguments that I made a sound point. If it rattles you, congratulations, you’re alive and feeling something!

  21. Leslie
    January 30, 2013 at 5:41 am #

    I feel terribly sorry for the woman that gets stuck with you. Just can’t describe how much of an asshole you are, wow. You’re a catch.

    • February 7, 2013 at 9:42 am #

      On the top of this page there is a link called “What is Intentious?”

      If you were a person with a shred of honour you’d go up there and read it now, think about what it says and apologise.

      But you’re a bitch, and frankly, I don’t give damn what you think.

  22. February 7, 2013 at 3:10 am #

    Yep. You’re pretty much the slime of the century… Just goes to show folks, any one can write and publish an article, lol.

    • February 7, 2013 at 9:43 am #

      On the top of this page there is a link called “What is Intentious?”

      If you were a person with a shred of honour you’d go up there and read it now, think about what it says and apologise.

      But you’re a bitch, and frankly, I don’t give damn what you think.

  23. Trista
    February 8, 2013 at 3:54 am #

    I just think that “White” men in general doesn’t care about looks or anything else that’s important, that’s why the ratings of divorce is so high compared to other cultures! My culture it’s not just all about looks, it’s also about being fair and what’s wrong and right! If you were lied to that means you’re dishonor your family and yourself! My culture very different from yours Jason, we are very “close and family” we don’t think that there’s anything wrong with what your opinions stating, just that in this topic the wife was lying and emotionally and mentally misleading the husband and thought that maybe she can pull it off! But relizing that genitics can’t fool the eyes of ppl. Nothing wrong with plastic surgery dude, just if you’re going to pull something off like that, make sure you know the “karma” that follows it!
    I say ppl that takecare of themselves more power to you and those that just sit at home, eat your feeling, and getting fat and blaming the world, you guys can keep complaining! Btw…you’re a handsome guy with a sharp tongue dude!!

  24. Jane
    February 9, 2013 at 9:59 am #

    Wow, the stupid thing here is with the whole genetics thing, HALF OF THE GENES ARE HIS!!! If his genes are not dominant enough to override her “ugly genes” then it is HIM who is genetically unfit. Also genetics doesn’t work whereby two beautiful people make beautiful babies, you can have throwbacks and you never know the “ugly” could have come from his dodgy genes instead. Also “ugly” genes are not always a bad thing as good aspects of genetics are often linked in with bad things, for example shortsightedness is linked to higher IQ, even if the glasses look unsightly you have a survival advantage of being clever something which in today’s world is more important than ever before for getting ahead. Asian populations coincidentally have the highest rate of shortsightedness in the world.

    My boyfriend in fact is very handsome and damn clever (with a doctorate) but without glasses he is almost blind and it occurred to me that in caveman days he may not have survived very long, but his father is the same and earns loads of money due to his career from his intelligence. What I also find bizarre is that the looks he inherited from his family are very dominant, everyone looks very similar however most of them are quite weird looking to the point of being ugly, whereas he has the best of the features and ended up handsome and I do sometimes worry that with his dominant looks that our children will look like his side of the family, but with the weirdness! For example they all have big noses, chins and have eyes quite close together, my boyfriend looks just right so he looks very manly and handsome whereas some of the others have slightly too big noses/ears and eyes TOO close together. Genetics is a gamble!

    • February 10, 2013 at 10:47 am #

      “If his genes are not dominant enough to override her “ugly genes” then it is HIM who is genetically unfit.”

      This is a completely ignorant statement about how genetics works. There is no such thing as “dominant” or “recessive” genes. There are simply variations in the level of gene expression and different alleles for a particular gene loci on a chromosome.

      If you think “dominance equals good” then you must believe that Huntingtons’s disease is good thing to be spreading about too as the Huntington gene is “dominant”.

      There is less than 2% difference between humans and chimpanzees genetically, this 2% is not enough to account for the massive difference we see between our two species. The biggest difference is in the rates of gene expression. Interestingly the farther away we move from chimpanzees more often we have less gene expression instead of more. It’s not that uniform of course, other genes are expressed far more. But the point I’m making is that genetics is very complicated and what you just wrote there is utter nonsense.

  25. Jane
    February 9, 2013 at 10:03 am #

    Oh and the other thing is that ugliness in a child doesn’t always lead to ugliness later on! I know several people who were pretty average/ugly as a child, who ended up being gorgeous once they were adult.

    One male friend of mine at school I never fancied as he was weird looking, grew up got a defined face and natural muscle and now is stunning! Gutted I was shallow enough not to snap him up when he was young and ugly (he’s married now!)

  26. Loulou
    February 9, 2013 at 4:38 pm #

    All animals are ‘hardwired’ to make themselves attractive to potential mates; this increases the opportunity of having a higher number of offsping. Oddly, it is typically the male of the species who preens and beautifies themselves in order to attract a female. Charles Darwin called this ‘sexual selection’. Strange isn’t it that it’s now the female of the species who modifies themselves in order to attract a male. Is this fraud or just evolution?

    • February 10, 2013 at 10:53 am #

      “Oddly, it is typically the male of the species who preens and beautifies themselves in order to attract a female.”

      No. This is typical in birds, the opposite is typical in mammals. There are a number of interesting hypothesis for why this is the case, but no one really knows for certain. One explanation is that, in opposition to mammals, male birds are ZZ (XX) while female birds ar ZW (XY), so perhaps the sex that has two homogenous sex chromosomes is the pretty/beautiful one? Again, why this would be the case is a mystery to current scientific understanding.

      Men also modify themselves to attract women. Usually by building up more money, bling and muscle. But also mastering a skillful act like dancing or musical performance. The difference is women focus on their bodies and men focus on their behaviour.

  27. Jocelyn
    February 10, 2013 at 12:33 pm #

    Oh, wow. How could she do that to him?? She could have just saved herself some time, money, and unwanted children by telling him, “Oh, by the way, honey, I used to be REALLY ugly.” Some women were just not meant to reproduce. Some men, too, for that matter.

    • February 16, 2013 at 9:58 am #

      I often think that about women who think they can trap a man by getting pregnant to him “accidentally”. If he doesn’t chose you, he can never be yours, even if the law forces him to stay, even if the law forces him to pay. There is no coersion in love, a man must own himself so he can give himself. A free man is not an object, he is not anyone’s possession, he is a not fool and he can never be tamed.

  28. Desu
    February 15, 2013 at 11:05 am #

    Jeez, Jason. I hope you get beaten to death by a mob of women one day, you patriarchal fuckwit.

    • February 16, 2013 at 10:01 am #

      Hahahaha! Let’s reverse the sexes for this comment: “I hope you get gang raped to death by a mob of angry men one day.”

      Wow, Desu, you’re one violent bitch aren’t you? Care you meet me for drinks one evening? *blows a kiss*

    • February 16, 2013 at 3:10 pm #

      Wow. Between Jason and Desu here, it’s pretty clear which one has the issues. Dare you to post that comment again using your full name, that is, if you believe what you say warrants being taken seriously.

  29. barry jone
    February 17, 2013 at 5:46 am #

    As long as she’s in the kitchen I don’t care

  30. Teri Illuminati
    March 4, 2013 at 5:27 pm #

    Jason Southerland, if you get out of the shower and even comb your hair, you are, also, not being “honest” and if you get dressed and look nice, you are not being “honest” either… We dress, do our hair, women wear makeup, etc…because that is the way you attract a man. If men weren’t such PIGS and have their tongue hang out every time a woman with big boobs walks by, we wouldn’t be getting breast implants, either!! We do it all for YOU!! If you weren’t such superficial and shallow, then we wouldn’t be doing all this crap to please you!! If you insisted that a woman be smart, and a good mother, etc…then we would cater to what you are looking for… So, when you see women going to extremes, remember, it’s what you MEN are looking for, and we are just learning how to play the game…. You all do the same, too, so quit being such a b*tch about it…(Unless you are gay, or in the closet, then it would be spot on – to write an article like this…) LMAO

  31. shelley
    March 19, 2013 at 8:16 am #

    i starting to feel that society’s going backwards – i wonder why we haven’t ended up losing the power of speech and becoming savage, not to mention bashing each other with clubs! why bother with perfection? you could be the most genetically perfect super being, and have a sprog who has a disability! not that there’s nothing wrong with people who have disabilities , but my point is that in spite of this whole desire to have a perfect mating partner , ironically there is a chance that somewhere along the line these “perfect genes” will flip the bird! also, there are some people who detest the idea of being with someone on the autism spectrum, because they are not the perfect partner, yet ironically some of the most fantastic people in history are autistic or allegedly have autism! i should know because i happen to have the diagnosis of PDD – NOS and i think that what anyone says that they don’t want an autistic child is missing the point! why to we have to be a boring stepford population of barbie and ken dolls! that would be really boring! it’s the flaws that makes things interesting, not the perfection! 😛

  32. Brittany
    March 21, 2013 at 6:08 am #

    I have one question. Is it alright for a women to sue her husband after their marriage because he has a small penis? In most marriages that are for reproducing only there is no sex before marriage. No woman would wish for their son to have such a bad geneic problem passed on. Small penises are an undsirable trait.
    If he really cared about her geneics he would have looked at her mother, father, and grandparents. And if you look at her before and after picture the only thing that changes is her makeup and eye shape. And to be honest any chinese woman or he himself could have giving him children with the chinese eye shape. I think he was looking for a chinese woman with a westren look. lol
    Plus everyone knows just because you are ugly or pretty as a kid doesnt mean you will be when you grow up. He probly felt like a fool when the DNA test came back saying the girl was his. He is just a man who cant face failure.
    And the answer to your earlier statement. Yes he should have just taken it in the chin. She was fooled into marring a prick who lies too. He said in his statement that they married for love. Life sucks, deal with it.
    Also you are a white male. You dont know what hard work is compared to African Americans and women. You might have to do somework but not like other minorities. The proof is in our history books and everyday statistic.
    Do your homework before you talk. Nothing you say is backed up or sited. All you do is rant. But still you are entitled to rant even if its just bubbles coming out of your black hole in your pants.

    • Tim
      May 1, 2013 at 5:07 am #

      This is a blog. Have you never read a blog before?

  33. Jess-charlietheunicorn
    March 21, 2013 at 11:22 am #

    He made a choice to have a kid and then rejected it, what a moron, maybe he shouldn’t have poured a good chunk of his genes into that kid, therefore both parents are equally at fault. c’est la vie 🙂 I love girls with glasses and clothes (fully dressed the better) because it is so unnatural its hot. So I go out in public a la naturel and people look at me the same as if I wear make-up so I honestly don’t see the difference. My daughter is gorgeous and the father is ugly obviously I had poor choice in fathers and I should sue him for putting gel in his hair and using starch on his shirts.

  34. March 25, 2013 at 8:02 pm #

    Thanks for penning this great publish..Loved your content pieces. Be sure to do continue to keep writing

  35. Anonymous
    April 30, 2013 at 9:51 pm #

    I’d be happy to pay for you to see a therapist. I can’t imagine a worse hell than being you.

    • April 30, 2013 at 10:03 pm #

      Sounds good to me. Counseling usually costs about $150 per session so if you could wire me $1500 for starters I’d gladly spend it for you.

  36. Tim
    May 1, 2013 at 5:05 am #

    Oh man. You upset the granola bars this time. Everything from offers to pay for therapy to god knows what else… I’m reading your articles more often :).

  37. Raye Robinson
    May 1, 2013 at 5:50 am #

    This article was utterly appauling to read from a females POW. Its not even an accuarte assumption to believe that he got “ugly children” from her. Genetics are passed down a long line from BOTH maternal and farternal lineage, and it is virtually impossible to “know where” a child recieve his or her traits… who knows.. His children may have recieved an “ugly” trait from his great great great grandpa or grandma..

  38. Kiefer Sutherland
    May 1, 2013 at 6:07 am #

    Hey Jason, your mom and I have been trying to reach you but you never seem to pick up your phone. Just wanted to let you know we’ve been having some troubles with our settlement. It seems that the court can’t come to a conclusion as to whether it was your mother or I who was responsible for your tasteless, perverted ‘pragmaticism.’

    On a lighter note, I just got off the phone with Dr. Barnbrook and he assured me that being a crude and deluded bastard isn’t hereditary. Isn’t that great?! Looks like you’ve managed it all on your own kiddo!

    I’d love to stay and chat but mom and I are going out for steak tonight. I think we’ll just settle amicably, save the cash and scoot off to Aruba for a little while. Good luck with work and “shopping for a mother.” I hope the funds we’ve sent over can cover the expenses and your rent.

    Speak soon buddy,

    Lots of love,
    Dad

    • May 2, 2013 at 8:35 pm #

      ^This one is at least inventive. I never knew Jason was related to Kiefer Sutherland! Go figure. 😉 Btw, what led you to finding this article, may I ask?

  39. May 1, 2013 at 6:41 am #

    So, um, to what chapter of the Nazi party do you belong? You just spouted the worst kind of eugenic argument I’ve ever seen, and it’s not a new idea. You’re a moron who knows nothing about genetics.

  40. Anonymous
    May 1, 2013 at 7:36 am #

    Damn she was fugly before…good for you dude. I don’t agree with 100% everything but your entitled to your own opinion and are being no-nonsense honest about things. Most people here have just made so many excuses for women that they can’t see the truth. Kick a guy in the balls and it’s hilarious, kick a woman period and it’s an offense that’s shocking. Guys want to get laid so they can’t say the truth and women…well they’re just women confusing as hell. Peace dude, keep doing what your doing you actually have the balls for it unlike most pussy whipped guys.

  41. May 1, 2013 at 7:37 am #

    after reading this, i can not contain my hate for you. i want to punch my computer. i won’t even take the time to present the plethora of arguments that so many people have already presented before me, though apparently nothing will get you to shut your ignorant mouth. i just wanted you to know you are hated by one more person in this world. keep up the good work!

  42. Alex B
    May 1, 2013 at 8:05 am #

    To be honest, JERKS like you are the reason why these women go through surgery. I, myself do not support or like plastic surgery, but after reading your article, it seems to me that you are even worse than the man who sued his wife.

    #1 Look at yourself first BEFORE you judge other people’s appearance, genes, and etc. To be honest, you are NOT even that GOOD LOOKING or INTELLIGENT enough to judge and criticize others. You just sound like a NARROW MINDED sexist, selfish, and inconsiderate human being. NO ONE is born with perfect features. Due to foolish men like you who look at others’ outer appearances ONLY, women become very insecure about their features and desperately choose plastic surgery.

    #2 THERE IS NO GUARANTEE THAT YOUR OFFSPRING WILL BE BORN WITH IDEALISTIC FEATURES!!! Even with our present technological capabilities there is no precedent for perfection. If I recall correctly, there was one man who sought for an ideal human…his name was Hitler.

    #3 Women who decide to not have children do not have low standards!!! Some can’t even have kids even if they wanted to due to health issues that prevent them. IT IS NOT UP TO YOU TO BASH WOMEN WHO CAN’T HAVE KIDS!!!!

    Everyone has the right to do whatever they want with their bodies!!!!!!!!! No one has the right to criticize others for things they don’t understand!!!! You should think before you speak.

  43. Marian
    May 1, 2013 at 8:18 am #

    All children should be loved. No matter their appearance.

  44. Seriously?
    May 1, 2013 at 8:30 am #

    I’m sorry, but your whole erudite and judgemental bunch of bullshit got shown up as soon as you put about wanting your children to be attractive, what a shallow and disrespectful thing to say. How can you talk about honour and say things like that? You’re the epitome of oxyMORON

  45. amy
    May 1, 2013 at 9:02 am #

    There is an obvious age gap between the three children… so regardless of the wife “scamming” her husband it really should not have taken THREE children to figure it out. I feel bad for the kids that will grow up now surrounded by this lawsuit and horrible parents. No body wins here

  46. Graham
    May 1, 2013 at 5:59 pm #

    I’m a haemophiliac, pretty offended by the fact that you suggest people wouldn’t want ot have kids with me because of my condition.

  47. V
    May 2, 2013 at 7:44 pm #

    Ok wow!I just had to comment! It seems to me that Jason is truly doing this for the controversy. He may have the opinions he is spouting or he may not. We are all entitled to what ever opinions we have.

    What we are not entitled to is being insulting to people of a varying opinion. E.G. The fact that a person does not like others of a different race is only tolerated by society’s standards if he/she does not go around abusing all others that are different whether verbally or physically. Thus by the same standards Jason and almost everyone here has fallen short. You cannot expect to change a person’s way of thinking by being insulting towards them.

    There are many reasons to get married, stay married stay single, have kids don’t have kids. The only real rule is to not hurt another person by your actions (in my opinion).

    It is assumed that the lawsuit would hurt his children (common sense dictates this). However none of us actually know for a fact that his children were harmed by his actions. Thus cannot categorically state that his actions have harmed his children.

    We do know he was hurt by her actions and we all agree she was most likely deceptive (assuming she never said a word and hid all her pre-op photos from him). How a person deals wiith hurt is different person to person and thus none of us can state how he should deal with the pain as no one here is the victim and only the victim can quantify that pain and how the person that caused the pain should be penalised. The fact that if it was you, you would…… only makes it about you, not the victim in this case the husband.

    I disagree with his actions but then i am not the one in pain. I would hate for anyone to tell me how to react to what I consider a painful situation and for that reason he may react as he wills as long as it is neither abusive or illegal.

  48. Melanie
    May 2, 2013 at 11:24 pm #

    Your views are based on attention grabbing, and yes you did have mine for some time reading through the threads after the article.. At first I believed your views to be satirical, but when I saw how you treated your readers I was appalled. I just hope that you have a nice time trying to get a genetically responsible woman to even talk to you. Once she gets to know you I hope she has enough sense to realize how much better her DNA is without a misogynist twerp like you belittle her children. By the way small penises should be a crime and the men who have them should be sterilized. JUST SAYING.

  49. Anonymous
    May 3, 2013 at 12:09 am #

    Beauty is only skin-deep, but ugly is to the bone!

  50. Michelle
    May 10, 2013 at 12:51 am #

    Really now he’s no longer attracted to Asian women? Funny how one Asian women changed that for you. Do you feel the same about other races?
    “Oh no, there’s an ugly Latina, better check them off my list”

  51. LKAY
    May 24, 2013 at 3:18 am #

    hmmmm…. this way of thinking reminds me of something…. oh yeah. Sounds just like Hitler’s “perfect race.” Now THERE’S someone to emulate. NOT!!
    People who are ugly on the inside should not be permitted to reproduce!

  52. wil
    May 24, 2013 at 5:21 am #

    Jason, have you not been loved adequately before? C’mon man, we are all human and I am flawed in many ways. I am not perfect and I don’t many criteria but I will try my best to love you man. I think you have some points but at the same time, I think this perspective of yours came from living in a cold–cruel world. Thaw that heart of yours!

    Love,

    another regular man

  53. Anonymous
    May 24, 2013 at 11:04 am #

    I cannot believe people like you actually exist. The only thing that redeems this post is the multitude of comments pointing out how deeply misguided you are. Please see this as an impetus for some personal growth.

  54. Balsaqti Bag'har
    May 28, 2013 at 1:20 am #

    Is this the Ironic Review?

  55. Kai
    June 13, 2013 at 1:40 pm #

    Hmm well if men choose to marry women who solely care about appearance and superficial things.. Your bound to get situations like this, so he has no right to complain about having ‘ugly’ kids. That’s who he chose to reproduce with, tough shit. Some guys need to open their eyes and get it together. Seriously.

  56. Salome
    December 29, 2015 at 7:05 pm #

    “This woman frankly should not have been able to reproduce because she’s the carrier of genetic refuse.”

    It’s ironic that Jason should state this when he himself is a carrier of a lot of genetic refuse. Seen him on doctor Phil? A presumably young guy who already looked like he was in his 50s with scrawny, unmanly shoulders, hideous teeth and the bald gene. And the older he becomes, the worse he’ll look. Plus, he’s not particularly intelligent either, nor does he know how to hold his ground. So not only is he physically genetic refuse, but intellectually too. But if a genuinely attractive woman came up to Jason and offered to reproduce with him, do you think he’d turn it down and say “I shouldn’t reproduce. I’m too ugly”? Of course not, he’d snatch up the opportunity. No one wants to look at themselves and admit that they shouldn’t pass on their genes. One standard for others and an entirely different standard for yourself eh? And the way he talks, he obviously thinks he’s top shit and the next big thing since Jesus Christ. Pot calling the kettle black, Jason?

    What makes this even funnier is that this story is fake. Lift some weights, loser. Or are you hoping that women will somehow look through your scrawny self and fall for your imaginary genius?

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Fact #343: A Chinese man successfully sued his wife for having ugly children. | namanknowledge - April 26, 2013

    […] Source: http://intentious.com/2012/10/28/chinese-man-successfully-sues-wife-for-ugly-children/ […]

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: