Segregation 2.0

Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you’ll know that in the 1960s there was this thing called the civil rights movement that overturned the Jim Crow laws that established, amongst other things, separate schools for whites and blacks in parts of America. It was decided, by the values of the day, that it was now wrong to keep students apart from each other just because they were different races.  This quickly expanded to include religion as well, Christian schools were no longer allowed to discriminate against students based on religion.  This was to be the beginning of the brand new era of diversity education.  However, you might be surprised to learn that this thinking was apparently all wrong.  According to Toronto’s LGBT community segregation would be a good thing for homosexuals, bisexuals and transgendered people.

To be honest, I don’t doubt that a gay high school would be a better place for gay children to study at.  But if it’s good for gays, why isn’t it good for whites and Christians?  The fact is, segregation in education is good for everyone.  Muslims for example are allowed to have Muslim only schools, so are the Jews, they do this throughout the West, in fact it’s only Christians who aren’t allowed this privilege without the risk of a lawsuit, atheists are in a similar boat because secular schooling isn’t the same as religion-free schooling, in Australia for example we have to put up with the school chaplaincy program.  It’s Christians and only Christians who are not allowed.  Schools that have low levels of ethnic diversity also perform better than schools that have higher levels of ethnic diversity.  Less bullying, less gangs, less drugs, less absentees and better grades.  For some reason, people who share a common cultural and ethnic background just seem to get along with each other better than populations of mixed background.  Who would have thunk it?  Oh wait, this Jewish guy called Robert Putnam did a comprehensive study on diversity and found it was toxic to civilisation, another fact that the left-wing mainstream media have decided you don’t need to know, because even if multiculturalism doesn’t work, you’re still forced to have it, and you were never asked if you wanted it.  It’s another case of, both political parties agree, so what’s the point of holding an election or a public debate?

However, while it’s great that “progressive” governments want to protect the ethnic, cultural and sexual values of non-whites, non-Christians and non-heterosexuals, it makes it very hard to justify abolishing the Jim Crow laws because they’re saying segregation is great, except for white people. White people have to have multiculturalism, even if it is bad for them and their communities.

When comparing the SAT scores of white children to black children, black children have never been able to compete on the same level as white children. According to IQ test scores this is simply because black Americans are not as intelligent as white Americans on average. Further evidence to support this comes from the fact the Asian Americans score higher on IQ tests than white Americans and out perform on SAT tests compared to white Americans.  To put it bluntly, the races are not equal in intelligence.  But if you’ve followed sport you’ll also realise that what black people lack in IQ, they make up for in athletic prowess.  In short, different races have differences strengths and weaknesses.

However, these are facts, and facts will never satisfy a left-winger who is obsessed with equality.  Even if it means trying to make unequal things equal, not because anyone wants equality but because left-wingers suffer from OCD and a fanatical desire to warp reality to fit their ideology. Since the second world war the left-wing (cultural Marxists) have been at war with the education system not just in the USA, but in the West in general.  The civil rights movement in regards to school was based on the erroneous belief that white schools were better funded than black schools and that was the only reason why black children weren’t able to compete with white children.  It was thought that by forcing white schools to allow black students then black people would finally catch up to white people in educational attainment. However, this failed.  When it failed they invented a ridiculous notion that racism is why blacks can’t perform as well as white children.  Even when some schools pay black students hundred of dollars to attend class and to hand in assignments the black students still couldn’t compete with the white students as equals.

Let’s think about this for a moment. Just say I tell you that you’re not good enough to join my basketball team. Is your first reaction to keel over and fail miserably? Or is it to try harder to prove me wrong?  If black people are so fragile psychologically that being called a few names is enough to make them fail school then that’s real racial inferiority right there.  To my knowledge, there is no proof that this “racism” even exists, rather people so obsessed with trying to find racism have found it in people who merely acknowledge racial differences exist.  The fact is, in all 16,000 plus school districts in the USA there is not one where black students out-perform white students.  Are we to believe that all 16,000 school districts, even those run by blacks, are so racist that they deliberately mark all the black students down?  If you believe that, you’re a conspiracy theorist seeing racists everywhere and I won’t waste breath dealing with you.

I’ve got a proposal here. Why don’t we get rid of all these intrusive and anti-democratic laws forcing people to associate with people against their will? Let schools and workplaces hire the people they want. If they want all-gays, let them, if they want all men, let them, if they want all Christians, let them, if they want all-white let them. Why do I say this? Because right now we live in a country where there are companies that have Indian only workforces, Asian only workforces, Muslim only work forces, but everywhere white people work they have to be “diverse” otherwise they’re breaking the law. White people aren’t stupid, the vast majority can see this double standard and with each passing year they’re getting more angry about being treated as second class citizens in the country their ancestors built for them and their children, not for foreigners and foreign children. If we keep pushing the white population around like this, treating them to a double moral standard this melting pot will turn into a powder keg. It’s as simple as that.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Categories: Beliefs, Morals, Multiculturalism, Politics, Law

Author:Jason Sutherland

Resist the temptation to assume that you're always right or wrong. Never succumb to thinking you're so insignificant to trust your own thoughts and feelings. Always be responsible and listen carefully to others before passing judgement. Don't trust governments bearing stolen goods.

Subscribe to Intentious

Be notified by email whenever new pieces are posted by the blogging team tackling controversial current events or issues.

26 Comments on “Segregation 2.0”

  1. Abram
    September 27, 2012 at 9:44 pm #

    the logic here is so ridiculous – you seem to have organized your article around what is orthodox left and right thinking and how can I prove the left wrong – why not forget about that divide all together and just treat everyone like an individual – black, white, yellow whatever – could it be then that nothing fits into arguments based along racial and left/right lines? Perhaps you could start looking beyond the box you’ve created for yourself here!

    • September 27, 2012 at 9:54 pm #

      Did you even click on the links? Or do any research besides listening to the feel good garbage they spoon feed people?
      The point is that we ARE treating them like individuals…and it’s not working.
      Sorry but whether you like it or not SCIENCE is not racist and has pointed in numerous ways that we are not, in fact, ‘all created equal’.

      • markaid
        September 27, 2012 at 10:12 pm #

        The feel good garbage they spoon feed people ? Who are they? NEW IMMIGRANTS also need to do the same – not stay in enclaves where they don’t MIX with the rest of us – if they live in Australia they need to adopt our values.

        • September 27, 2012 at 10:25 pm #

          ‘They’ are the media, civil rights’ groups, and government officials who feel like it’s good for their careers to act like they give a crap about these issues. Those are rough examples since the ‘they’ is so amorphous as to include people like YOU. You know very well you can’t point at a single person or group to blame for this.

          You are a fool. You say to accept everyone then expect them to give up their cultural identity upon entry into your country. Isn’t that the opposite of acceptance?

          • September 27, 2012 at 10:38 pm #

            ‘isn’ that the opposite of acceptance’? What are you asking me for I’m a fool aren’t I?

            • September 27, 2012 at 10:51 pm #

              I said you were a fool not a retard. This is so simple even a fool like you can clearly see how right we are. Hence, your dodging.

              • September 27, 2012 at 11:15 pm #

                ‘This is so simple even a fool like you can clearly see how right we are’ – OMG the assumption of superiority here – astounding! And dodging…that’s a laugh when you don’t even use a picture of yourself for an avatar! LOL

  2. Abram
    September 27, 2012 at 10:02 pm #

    Another thing I noticed here – when you say forcing people to associate with others against their will – you seem to be suggesting that people can’t get along or that you’ve decided not to like someone based on their race! Perhaps you could consider that multiculturalism is a way to take away the narrow viewpoint where you look at a person from the perspective of where they come from or their color rather than as an individual first.

    • September 27, 2012 at 10:08 pm #

      You’ve skipped over the point that the people were not asked or consulted. Their wishes were simply never sought and their objections ignored at best or called racist/Nazi/facist/haters at worst. Why can’t we decide this matter democratically? Why does multiculturalism need to be forced onto people?

      • September 27, 2012 at 10:20 pm #

        Because there’s documentation saying that the majority of people would vote NO to immigration, NO to multiculturism, and NO to affirmative action meant to bootstrap less capable or lazier INDIVIDUALS up to the level they should already be playing at…if they actually were equal.

        If given a choice this state of affairs would not exist.

      • markaid
        September 27, 2012 at 10:32 pm #

        Multiculturalism is not forced onto people – it just seems that way for people who don’t realize that immigrants have traditionally worked harder for Australians who have employed them because they have come from much tougher environments and proved to be beneficial to Australian companies/the economy because of their work ethic. Waves of immigrants have come here as you probably know and have contributed to make Australian companies stronger because immigrants don’t complain when their fleeing a harsh environment for a better one. What happens next is that we see the second-generation of immigrants (their children) being relatively well off and Australians suffering. We need to see them giving Aussies a leg up in return but no one gets anything without working hard.

        • September 27, 2012 at 10:44 pm #

          The only reason why immigrants work harder than Australians is because the immigrants come from countries without a welfare system. The children of immigrants turn into the same welfare dependent weaklings as Australians do in 2-3 generations. The welfare state is toxic to human dignity. We’re not cattle, we don’t need a nanny state to coddle us. The state needs to stop making decisions for us and get the hell out of our lives, our homes, our marriages, our families and our workplaces. They need to stick to defence and criminal justice only.

          And multicultural IS forced on people. Supply evidence to the contrary.

          • September 27, 2012 at 11:05 pm #

            ‘we don’t need a nanny state to coddle us’ – totally agree – it does create weaklings but a safety net is needed. ‘multiculturalism is forced on people’ – you obviously ‘see’ people as a cultural entity before you see them as a person – if you didn’t you might see that people are just mixing with people.

            • September 27, 2012 at 11:38 pm #

              “you obviously ‘see’ people as a cultural entity before you see them as a person”

              No. I just recognise that races exist. They are not mere social constructs. An albino African is not a white for example. Forensic scientists can determine race from skull shape or a blood test. Organ donations between races don’t ever work. Mixed race people will never find a compatible organ donor ever. The brains of white people are 25% larger than Africans even after socio-economic status is taken into account. Race is a physical reality, it is not a cultural construct. No one doubts the Ashkenazi Jews are of superior genetic stock and that’s why they produce so many Nobel laureants. Why is it ok to be a proud Jew, but not to be a proud white? Why is Israel allowed to protect their ethnic purity by deporting tens of thousands of African migrants, but whites aren’t allowed to even think of such things. It’s a double standard and it needs to be talked about publicly.

  3. September 29, 2012 at 6:59 pm #

    My views on this are: there are ethnic diferences that creeped into the genetic pool with time. Forcing cultures (not people) to have the same results ignores that cultures are not the same.

    And Jason is right, multiculturalism is being forced into whites (but not arabs, chinese, indians or blacks; just whites). And there is a reason for that: cultural marxism. It was always their goal to destroy western civilization (white civilization).

    • September 29, 2012 at 7:28 pm #

      @Mats – It was always their goal to destroy western civilization ? really? I don’t know who ‘they’ are but Western civilization comes from a number of sources – your numeric system (Arabic numerals) came from the Arabs after an Italian (Fibonnacci) said it was a good idea. The Romans and Greeks founded much of our civilization (Democracy is a Greek word and idea) – DONT YOU GUYS READ HISTORY??? One of the major books of the West is the Bible (heard of that one?) – if you read it you will know that much of our civilization comes from Jews and Romans and Africans and Babylonians and Egyptians – later contributions from the English, French, Germans and Spanish. You guys are so narrow the way you write – like you’re in a box created by your narrow views of what Western civilization is and comes from. Try reading more history about the origins of Western Civilization and EXPAND your minds….please!!!
      @Jason Sutherland – ‘Organ donations between races don’t ever work.’ – you need to do more research on that one – have you ever wondered why people from mixed races actually have babies? Wow they are so incompatible they can have babies with each other! It’s amazing, eh? Try to look at similarities sometimes instead of always focusing on differences!

      • September 30, 2012 at 12:17 am #

        “your numeric system (Arabic numerals) came from the Arabs after an Italian (Fibonnacci) said it was a good idea.”

        Actually, it came from India. I challenge you to find one single original idea the Arabs contributed to civilisation. If you do, it’ll be news to me. Also, European Mathematics was already incredibly advanced before then already, the numerals used was a tiny contribution. Finally algebra existed long before the Arabs put their name on it.

        I’m really not sure what point you’re trying to make though. Are you trying to say that multiculturalism isn’t new? Yes, there are many tribes of Europeans, but there are also many nations. These nations are being denied their soveriegnty though through international politico-banking establishments and the EU(SSR) and non-Europeans are invading our homelands. Since WWI European culture and civilisation has been in decline, it has been happening even faster in recent decades.

        I take it by ‘expand our minds’ you’re asking us to give up on nations state in favour of a massive centralised global government? Forget “Blood and Land” and embrace a nomadic stateless existence? That kind of existence only works for parasites. Yes, settlers/farmers are producers, nomads are parasites. If all of us “expand” our minds and become parasites there will be no one to feed off. Do you know the story about the grasshoppers and the ants? We live in the age of the grasshoppers and the numbers of ants are so few now that the ones who set this system up are close to choking themselves to death. While both the ants and the grasshoppers can lose, only the ants can win ultimately because only the ants produce anything.,2933,522337,00.html#ixzz1Y5ebB9Hz
        ^ Interracial breeding will end organ donations. It’s as simple as that.

        Human racial differences are the same as differences in dog breeds. Some breeds of dogs are smarter than others, some are more aggressive, some are more energetic, while others are more playful.
        ^ Indians have tiny penises,
        ^while Africans have big penises.
        ^ Different races have difference brain sizes and average IQ distributions

        Remember, a Great Dane and a Chiwawa are still the same species and can theoretically interbreed. But the offspring will be sickly. And yes, interracial childen have higher risks of genetic disease because they could inherit genetic disorders from two tribes instead of just one.

        If you want to continue believing this ridiculous simplistic notion that all men are created equal with the same sizes brains, the same sized penises it really doesn’t bother me. As the evolutionists say to the creationists: we have the evidence, we win.

        • markaid
          September 30, 2012 at 5:51 am #

          The donor program has been pushing for years to recruit more racial minorities and mixed-race donors. So far, multiracial volunteers make up just 3 percent of the 7 million people on the registry.

          Read more:,2933,522337,00.html#ixzz27tEwVAro

          The chances of finding a donor is less AT THE MOMENT due to the low recruit numbers (‘just 3 percent’). So organ donations DO WORK – but it is hard to get donors – please use LOGIC (logos comes from the GREEKS, by the way!)

          • September 30, 2012 at 6:45 am #

            Here’s some logic for you:

            If one race has alleles for ABC and another race has alleles for abc then how many combinations are there?


            That’s means even in a racially mixed population you won’t find donors easily, especially since we’re talking 4,000 genes that vary between races and mixed people could have any combination. But what if there was a third race? Äßç? It just got a lot more complicated.

            I’m a biologist, I’ve studied genetics you idiot.

            What you’re proposing is we just have to mix the races up more to find donors. But that’s utterly insane because the best approach is not to race mix at all. Your assumption that we have to come across to me as if you’re telling me I have no choice but to embrace homosexuality because it worries you I have a clear racial identity. That’s hatred man. Uncool.

  4. September 30, 2012 at 5:38 am #

    ‘non-Europeans are invading our homelands’ -are you an indigenous person? How did you and your ancestors happen to be in your ‘invaded’ homeland?

    • September 30, 2012 at 6:36 am #

      How dare you insult my ancestry and my blood you racist! Bigot! I am a descendent of the Vikings. Honoured blood flows through this veins. My homelands are from the north, my tribes are the Swedes, the Germans, the English and the Scots.

      If you laughed at reading this, consider you wouldn’t dare laugh at an aboriginal, asian or african if they said something like this. But that’s how white people are talked about: as uncultured, unsophisticated, impure, unpeople. The scale of anti-white racism in the mainstream media is horrifying. You just can’t see it until you talk about white people the same way as we talk about other races: then you quickly realised they’re trying to exterminate us all because they’re scared of us.

      To dare suggest that my people invaded Australia and that we all should take the collective blame for it is extremely prejudiced and racist. It is based on the idea that whites were never kept as slaves of their government and that the settlers of Australia weren’t convicts brought here against their will and forced into a situation of kill the aborigines or die themselves. When the colonies rebelled against Britain it was actually a slave revolt. Consider the ridiculously trumped up charges the British used to sentence ordinary people to send them here for use as slave labour. Consider the French Revolution a white slave rebellion and that as late as 1917 the Russian empire had 90 million white people kept as property of the state bound to the land and forced to work for their masters.

      You are the one who doesn’t understand white history. You are the ignorant racist bigot who thing white genocide is justified all all whites because 1% of whites are sociopaths. Well 1% of all other races are sociopaths too.

      However our politicians have been bought by foreigners with money and their campaigns financed for foreign interests. What kind of person sells out their own race? A sociopath does. By using money to buy politicians our leaders have been selected for sociopathic traits. Our leaders now don’t represent our people or their interests at all. We are an occupied people, enslaved to others.

  5. markaid
    September 30, 2012 at 7:07 am #

    Are you alright? You seem to be all over the place and not sticking to what I’m ACTUALLY saying. You don’t seem to get that I don’t care where you are from – opposite of a racist! I treat everyone as an individual – white, black, yellow, purple, pink – my partner is Scottish/Irish descent. As a biologist you would know about evolution and how plants and animals develop traits to improve their chances of survival – this creates diversity because that is what creates ‘fitness’ for life.

    • September 30, 2012 at 7:46 am #

      “You don’t seem to get that I don’t care where you are from – opposite of a racist!”

      Actually that’s exactly what racism is: denial of a person’s ethnic and cultural identity.

      “I treat everyone as an individual – white, black, yellow, purple, pink”

      If you treat everyone the same, you’re not treating them as individuals. Again, you reveal a callous indifference to other people.

      “my partner is Scottish/Irish descent.”

      Is this relevant? Or are you starting to feel worried?

      “As a biologist you would know about evolution and how plants and animals develop traits to improve their chances of survival.”

      *sigh* ever heard of a mule? It’s a very strong animal, but it can’t breed. It’s infertile. Interracial children are like this: without a people or a nation of their own they will eventually be wiped out. The west will soon collapse and China and India will reassert their domination over human affairs. They will regard all interracial children as slaves at best because without a common ethnic and cultural identity interracials can’t assert any right to self-rule.

      Thus, interracial marriage is a ticket to ethnic and cultural collapse.

      • September 30, 2012 at 11:02 am #

        You’ve got all the answers! A person’s ethnic and cultural identity – you seem to think there is a purity you can get to – didn’t your biology studies teach you that things change and evolve through outside influences? There is no purity in cultural or ethnic identity – your living in the dark ages if you think there is.

        • September 30, 2012 at 11:22 am #

          Have you never thought it odd that every animal breeder wants a purebred because they’re the healthiest animals? Humans are the same.

          Consider agriculture, we take a genetically diverse population and narrow down the gene-pool to the least diverse but most productive specimens. Naturally, there is less disease resistance, so we have limited diversity as a trade off against the kind of diversity that produces poor crop yields.

          I’ll say it again, I’m a biologist, you just read cultural Marxist propaganda and don’t think deeply about it at all. Every biologist worth their salt will tell you: human races are as distinct as breeds of dogs, horses, cattle etc… selective breeding to produce a new breed of dog that isn’t diseased and under productive takes generations. If you want to interbreed human beings to have the athleticism and penis size of Africans, the calm of Asians, the intelligence of Jews and the creativity of Europeans then you’re going to need a very long term highly selective breeding program and even then most of the people you produce will be more diseased than the purebred strains if they had been allowed to live naturally in isolation from foreign breeds.

          It works with plants and animals, the same applies to people. We’re animals too.

          Interracial marriages are just not a biologically sound idea. Nor are they culturally or political sound.

          • September 30, 2012 at 1:33 pm #

            Jason – I don’t accept propoganda – I make up my own mind based on EXPERIENCE and logic NOT marxism – don’t make assumptions based on BOX-type thinking please. I make up my own mind, I run a business, I’m not a public servant and I don’t have to base my arguments on OPPOSITION to something!
            Your views do not match human history and it surprises me this is not clear to you(maybe not obvious to someone who is thinking in a BOX). You seem to be getting race and biological compatibilty mixed up.
            The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to the history of Western civilization:
            Western civilization – pertains to the civilization that began in the Middle East and generally spread westwards, in contrast to Eastern civilization. In its broader sense, its roots may be traced back to 9000 BCE, when humans existing in hunter-gatherer societies began to settle into agricultural societies

            Among opposite-sex married couples, one in 10 (5.4 million couples) are interracial, a 28% jump since 2000. In 2010, 18% of heterosexual unmarried couples were of different races (1.2 million couples) and 21% of same-sex couples (133,477 couples) were mixed.
            The data show “we’re becoming much more of an integrated, multiracial society,” says demographer William Frey of the Brookings Institution.

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: