Pregnant Soldier Gives Birth In Afghanistan’s Camp Bastion

A British Soldier last week gave birth to the first ever baby born to an armed forces soldier actively serving in combat.

Lynette Pearce, a 28 year old Fijian born gunner in the British Royal Artillery who was fighting in Afghanistan, assisting to provide covering fire for troops fighting insurgents. She was at the same camp to which Prince Harry is deployed as a gunner co pilot in an Apache helicopter squadron, where a Taliban attack last week saw the death of two U.S. Marines, and six U.S. fighter jets were destroyed in Helmand.

After complaining of stomach pains, and seeking medical assistance, it was discovered she was in fact pregnant, and going into labour. Neither she, nor the Ministry of Defence suspected she was pregnant, having conceived before flying to Afghanistan for her six month tour of duty. With a 10million pound field hospital, she was in good care, despite the location, with doctors able to deliver her son safely despite being born in the 34th week of pregnancy. Lynette had completed a tough pre deployment training regime including a gruelling eight mile march and five mile run while pregnant.

It has been suggested that the conditions of deployment including the heat, unusual hours of working and diet changes where what she may have laid blame had she been feeling out of sorts, but she was obviously very fit and strong considering the stresses and strains of operating as a soldier on the front line. She had previously captained the Fijian national football team and played against Tonga and Australia, before leaving Fiji to fulfill an ambition to serve in the army.

She has since been flown home with her baby, and is said to be doing well despite the circumstances and the eight hour flight.

Sources have released that up to 200 service women have been sent home from Afghanistan and Iraq since 2003 after discovering that they were pregnant, but none while in service at the front line. While the army conduct hearing, sight, blood and weight tests, they do not conduct pregnancy tests on female soldiers, despite pressure following this incident. The government are calling this a matter of privacy and expect women to come forward when they fall pregnant, however in this instance, the soldier showed no signs. The army do not allow pregnant soldiers to fight, and insist that Pearce had done nothing wrong in this case as she did not know she was pregnant.

While it is great that the MoD feel they owe female soldiers a level of privacy, but  surely for their own good, pregnancy tests should become  compulsory for all female soldiers being certified fit to be sent to the front line. I think the risks outweigh the supposed privacy breach. The MoD are responsible for your safety when deployed and should be aware of any factors putting you at risk.

What is your right to privacy worth to you if you end up in a life threatening situation on tour, while pregnant without suitable pregnancy or newborn care, or worse still…

We should be calling for the MoD to act and make this simple test compulsory.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Categories: Beliefs, Morals, Gender issues, Health, Medicine, Multiculturalism, People, Politics, Law


Digital and Comms nerd working in an INGO. PhD researcher (technology / gender / International development / fragile and conflict affected states / South Sudan). Bibliophile. Writer. Musician. Views my own.

Subscribe to Intentious

Be notified by email whenever new pieces are posted by the blogging team tackling controversial current events or issues.

2 Comments on “Pregnant Soldier Gives Birth In Afghanistan’s Camp Bastion”

  1. September 23, 2012 at 6:11 pm #

    Louise, thanks for a great post. Compulsory pregnancy testing for soldiers is a sound and practical idea. We should also scrap the proposed modification of British nuclear submarines (at several million pounds per submarine) to carry a small handful of female sailors. What’s the betting some of these women will become pregnant (whether before or after setting off on tour…), Will we really divert a nuclear submarine in the event of a problem pregnancy requiring specialist treatment? Of course. A woman’s life will always trump all other considerations. Men’s lives have always been far more expendable.

    While we’re on the subject of compuslory tests, let’s introduce compulsory DNA testing of babies to stop the scandal of men unwittingly accepting lifelong responsibility for other men’s children.

    • September 25, 2012 at 11:02 pm #

      Thanks Mike. We love to be practical. The romantic in us shys away from it, but I think when you are serving in the armed forces, practicality needs to take over. Subs are another great angle I hadn’t thought to explore, but indeed, the same applies. Bottom line is pregnant women shouldn’t serve in active duty wherever they are, they don’t just put their life and the life of the baby at risk, but every other serviceman out there who will do exactly what you have described to save those at risk….serving or civilian…

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: