Sluts versus Ladies

I was told off the other night for criticising a feminist who was promoting sluthood.  You know the sort, “she’s not a slut, she’s just sexually liberated” or “she’s exploring her sexuality/discovering herself.”  Apparently, sluts are people we should admire, respect and perhaps emulate these days.  I know every tender minded idealist feels the need to label me a hater these days.  This of course amuses me because I was unaware that hating was a bad thing in of itself, nor that it is not completely bonkers to hate haters while claiming the moral high-ground.  Sarcasm aside, here are my top five reasons to treat sluts with disrespect.  Keep in mind, wherever I put the word “slut” the word “sleaze” fits just as well, I am singling out sluts here because there is an organised and well financed movement promoting sluthood in our society, but there is not one for promoting sleazehood.

1. Sluts Are Hedonists

Sluts are motivated not by values such as patience, moderation, thrift, dedication and loyalty, but by selfless devotion to their pink bits.  For a slut other people serve no greater purpose than as something to rub up against.  Sluts and sleazes are typically fucked then discarded by others because sluts and sleazes don’t actually offer anything useful to society except as a wanking post.  What I find hilarious is when some sluts admonish people for walking out on them after fucking them as if they do not do the same to other people.  Of course, if they valued anything more than physical pleasure, they might make interesting conversation or even have some talents they could exchange for someone hanging around long enough to develop a friendship with.

2. Sluts Are Unreliable

Sluts seem to think that men only want sex, yet have no explanation why the men who fuck them do not hang around.  The answer is simple, if you’re a man, would you want to marry the girl who fucked you on the first date?  Every modest man knows that any woman who can fuck them immediately after meeting them could fuck their best mate, the mailman or a tradie without hesitation or remorse.  Men want sex a lot, but that’s clearly not the only thing men desire from a woman otherwise sluts would be admired by everyone and not just sexual losers like pussy beggars.

3. Sluts Are Boring

Have you ever had an interesting conversation with a slut that didn’t involve sex or the slut herself and all the things she likes to pamper herself with? No?  I’m not surprised.  The reason is simple, if you’re obsessed with such base pleasures then you don’t have time or self-control to think of things like philosophy, politics and science.  I suspect the fact that so many young men spend their time talking to proud sluts is why many young men have this impression that women are vacuous, self-obsessed bores.

4. Sluts Spread Disease 

1 in 4 Americans carries or has carried a sexually transmitted diseases (STDs).  If everyone practiced safe, faithful, monogamous sex STDs wouldn’t exist.  The fact that they exist at all, much less the fact that they are so common is because of sluts.  It’s as simple as that.

Sluts used to be beaten and put to death for this very reason because spreading infectious diseases in the time before modern medicine was an act of manslaughter.  This is also why superstitious people associated disease with bad morals: they were right!  Anyone willing to kill themselves and other people just for sex is a morally retarded person.

5. Sluts Lack Moral Integrity 

People who prioritise their pleasure in life are hardly people you can count on to be honest and open about their intentions and actions.  Indeed, lying and deception are the only people skills sluts seem to care about learning.  Not just verbally lying, although they do a lot of that too, but lying with their body: seductive body language, cosmetics, corsets, push-up bras etc… Lying about their sexual health, lying about their interest in men sexually, lying about their wealth and status.

Essentially sluts are female sexual losers: they desperately seek sperm to reproduce as quickly and frequently as possible to pass on their genes because they don’t expect to be around here very long.  Thankfully in an age of contraception the sluts are taking themselves out of the genepool very quickly.

Now let’s compare these five things with another type of woman: the lady.  The lady is a sophisticated woman of sound moral calibre.  The lady can be harder to visualise in this day and age, simply because the mainstream media is enamored with the slut as the archetypal woman, but calling sluts typical is deeply offensive to most women who are not sluts.  Also keep in mind while reading this that there is a difference between the mainstream image of a lady (say of a woman from a Jane Austen novel) and the substance of a lady.  Ladies can exist in all levels of society, as can sluts.

1. Ladies Are Thinkers

A lot of people think that being able to learn complex tasks and repeat phrases on command is enough evidence that a person can think.   Consider that we can teach a chimpanzee to operate complex machinery, but we can’t teach the chimpanzee how to fix the machine when it breaks.  We make the mistake of thinking that simply because a person can operate a machine that they are intelligent.  No.  Intelligence is the ability to fix, invent or plan things, not merely operate tools.  The reality is that there are a lot of people in our society who are little more than chimpanzees with the ability to talk.  For me, when meeting a person for the first time, nothing better distinguishes a thinking person from an idiot than assessing their ability to look beyond the now.

Sluts can’t think past their next fucking because their physical pleasure is an end in itself, while a lady thinks ten, twenty, thirty or more years ahead.  What does she want from life?  How is she going to get it?  Will she have friends and security in the future?  What can she do to secure these things?  It’s thinking like this that leads to invention and resourcefulness.

Thus a good lady test is to ask a woman about the future.  If she gives a vague answer or simply says, “I don’t know/what a boring question,” then you have your first clue that she might be a slut.

2. Ladies Are Reliable

Ladies realise that if they want someone to stay with them then they can’t just be offering sex all the time. They actually need to enjoy doing other things with people and even care about them.  Ladies aspire to be pleasant, supporting and independent because being irritating, draining and dependent is not the key to being a reliable friend and if you are not reliable how can you expect other people to be towards you?

If a woman is always asking you for help and thinks she has a magical golden vagina that is the solution to every problem, this is your second clue that she is a slut.

3. Ladies Are Interesting

Ladies actually take an interest in the world around them.  They have hobbies, they read books, they have opinions on politics, they can explain how things work, they can teach you all sorts of useful things.

Contrast this starkly with the slut who only has sex as their hobby and themselves as their favourite topic of conversation.  If the woman you are chatting with does not seem to hold any opinions, does not know any useful skills and keeps talking about herself, this is your third clue that she is a slut.

4. Ladies Don’t Spread Disease

Ladies are fussy people, they don’t sleep with any tramp and they don’t sleep with them in the first hour of meeting them.  Ladies are always thinking about the consequences of their actions, is this man safe?  Is this man a sleaze?  Is this man honourable?  Does this man have balls or is he a coward?  A lady wants to look after herself, her family and her community.  Spreading STDs or genetic diseases by fucking any man willing to do her is harmful to all three.

Meanwhile the slut is there thinking, does he have a big penis?  Will he fuck me whenever I want?  Will he let me do whatever I want with him? If the woman you’re talking to likes talking about how many times, people and places she has had sex but doesn’t seem aware STDs exist or believes abortion is simply another form of birth control, this is your fourth clue that she is a slut.

5. Ladies Have Moral Integrity

Any person with the self-control to resist sex now in the hopes of having better sex in the future is a person with the moral fortitude to actually live up to their principles.

Any woman who can not resist spreading her legs when an opportunity to do so arises is a person who has no strength of character.  It does not matter how lofty or high-minded her principles are, when push comes to shove, this slut will throw you under the bus when it serves her interests to do so.  This is your fifth and final clue.

Hopefully by now you are sufficiently well educated to distinguish a lady from a slut and you can use this in your dating life.  In fact for all the men reading this right now, take a look at your woman and make a quick tally of the clues listed here, how does your woman score?  Is she a slut, or a lady?  If she gets 4 or 5 slut points, just dump her immediately, that is my advice for you.

Remember though, a slut can sometimes mature into a lady, but every time you give a fuck and acquiesce to her selfish demands then you are delaying her inevitable meeting with that mother-of-all-cluebats called reality which knocks the smut out of a slut and drives her towards ladyhood, something every woman with self-respect aspires to be anyway.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Categories: Beliefs, Morals, Gender issues

Author:Jason Sutherland

Resist the temptation to assume that you're always right or wrong. Never succumb to thinking you're so insignificant to trust your own thoughts and feelings. Always be responsible and listen carefully to others before passing judgement. Don't trust governments bearing stolen goods.

Subscribe to Intentious

Be notified by email whenever new pieces are posted by the blogging team tackling controversial current events or issues.

33 Comments on “Sluts versus Ladies”

  1. September 12, 2012 at 10:12 pm #

    Jason,

    I need your permission to translate this into my own lingo (keeping the link to the original).

    Thanks.

    • September 12, 2012 at 10:17 pm #

      Hey Mats,

      Sure, spread the word, so long as you have the link/reference to intentious.com and this article, I’d be honoured.

      Cheers.

  2. September 13, 2012 at 5:22 am #

    This is my (portuguese) blog: http://omarxismocultural.blogspot.com

    You’ll notice that I linked to the original when you start getting hits Usually, and thanks to all the brazilians friends who read the blog, I get > 1000 clicks/day.

    Thanks for the permission.

    Ps: If it’s not too much to ask, delete the previous comment. Thanks

  3. September 13, 2012 at 7:05 am #

    My three questions are:
    1- are you currently in a happy relationship with a “moral lady”?
    2- do you believe a woman loses value the more sex she has?
    3- can men also be “sluts”?

    • September 13, 2012 at 7:46 am #

      1. Ooh! A gutter ad hominem question? Let me guess if I answer ‘no’ I’ll get a whole page of text explaining that I’m some sort of fat lonely hairy man living in his mother’s basement and I’m sub-consciously angry at all women because of it?

      How about I answer this question with a question for you? Do you want all women to be sluts because it might mean you can finally get laid without having to beg first?

      2. Well duh, of course she loses value to me. I just wrote an article about it. In fact ask any man who has been in love with a woman and what happened to his respect for her when he found out she’d been sleeping around!

      3. Ok, I’ve told you before about this reading comprehension problem you have. Seriously, maybe there’s something wrong with your eyes? Go to the first paragraph and read the last sentence. Sit down for a few minutes, then get up and read it again and repeat this until the penny drops.

      • September 13, 2012 at 9:44 am #

        Ooh! A gutter ad hominem question?

        I don’t think your approach is conducive for meeting the women you want to be with. Perhaps that is the source of your anger, and your bitterness.

        Do you want all women to be sluts because it might mean you can finally get laid without having to beg first?

        Easy answer. No need to beg- it’s easy to get what you want in plentiful amouts when you have something that somebody else wants from you.

        Now that I have answered your question, I will ask the question, again politely:
        1- are you currently in a happy relationship with a “moral lady”?

        another answer you can give is “not at the moment but thusfar women who have chosen to be my lovers agree with me.”

        Well duh, of course she loses value to me

        Fair enough. For me a woman doesn’t lose value as she gets better (and more practice) at having sex. To expect a girl to be a virgin when she meets a worldly man is hypocritical.

        The only standard that is important is whether a person (man or woman) of value can keep their word or not on meeting me… their history before that point is unimportant.

        what happened to his respect for her

        Such close minded thinking in the age of sufferage and contraception, this mode of thinking based on blind prejudice and a pre 50y/o anachronism

        Seriously, maybe there’s something wrong with your eyes?

        I asked a question which you could have chosen to answer politely and with civility, but you appear incapable of… your viciousness speaks poorly of you. You spend an entire article putting down women and there is one small sentence caveat in fine print stating that it applies to men as well. Um, okay.

        One would be forgiven for thinking that your entire article applies to women only. I was asking for clarification; thanks for providing it by pointing me to the fine print.

        • September 13, 2012 at 10:22 am #

          lol… the level of projection from you is hilarious:

          Perhaps that is the source of your anger, and your bitterness.

          Yes, I get angry about this sort of thing, and I think it’s perfectly natural and healthy for any sane person to feel angry. But bitterness? What about your pedophilia? Ooops sorry, did I just make an accusation about your character without evidence? Sorry, fortunately I’m man enough to admit that that line of questioning is way out of line and I retract it. Are you man enough to do the same?

          Easy answer. No need to beg- it’s easy to get what you want in plentiful amouts when you have something that somebody else wants from you.

          So you pay women to have sex with you?

          1- are you currently in a happy relationship with a “moral lady”?
          2- do you believe a woman loses value the more sex she has?
          3- can men also be “sluts”?

          You know what, why don’t you man up and answer these three questions yourself?

          The only standard that is important is whether a person (man or woman) of value can keep their word or not on meeting me… their history before that point is unimportant.

          So say they slept with 5 different men in the week before you met them, that kind of history about them isn’t important to you? See, I have this hypothesis that you’re an arrogant sleazebag, and that’s why you’re struggling to comprehend why I don’t like sluts. It hits you too close to home. It’s just a hypothesis mind you, but if I could be bothered quote-mining everything you have written in comments on this site I’d have an axiom’s worth evidence before long, I’d wager.

          Don’t worry, I’m not sexist, I don’t like sleazebags anymore than I like sluts.

          Such close minded thinking in the age of sufferage and contraception, this mode of thinking based on blind prejudice and a pre 50y/o anachronism

          lol. Are you saying that I’m not trendy and hip even though I write for a website called “intentious.” NO WAY!

          your viciousness speaks poorly of you.

          My viciousness says that I’m a hardarse who’ll rip your leg off and beat you to death with the wet end if you mess with me; figuratively speaking… of course. I can understand how you might think poorly of me for being like this.

          One would be forgiven for thinking that your entire article applies to women only. I was asking for clarification; thanks for providing it by pointing me to the fine print.

          Second paragraph, second sentence and again in the seventeenth paragraph, third sentence. I can forgive you for missing it in the first paragraph, even though if you studied essay writing you would know is the most important paragraph in an essay, but a total of three times? Seriously, you need to learn to read properly, or just admit, you only read the headings and jumped to a conclusion and asked an ignorant question.

          • September 13, 2012 at 2:27 pm #

            an accusation about your character without evidence?

            I asked a question and levelled no accusation; there is nothing to retract. Notice how the very response you give is evidence of your mindset? None of my responses at all point to any leanings towards paedophilia. You make a good Intentious writer because you are easily baited and completely hysterical.

            For me, I ask questions because I always am wondering, “has this persons’ way of thinking afforded them what they want from the world?” From this I judge whether or not their approach has merit. I have nothing to apologise for but I see that you appear terrified to answer that question, about whether your views have granted you anything of value. Thus I judge your approach has little or no merit because it is overly belligerent for no discernable gain.

            So you pay women to have sex with you?

            So women have sex “for free” with you? Nothing in life is free. An alliance requires a mutual exchange of value between friends; that is why two equal parties agree to ally in the first place. There is more to a relationship that sex… there’s companionship, there are logistics, there are contacts, emotional and moral support. Those things are not “paid for”, they are mutually exchanged by two consenting adults, between friends or lovers.

            By myopically commiting “reductum ad absurdum” to say “so you pay to have sex” you make your own argument look like a ridiculous charicature.

            You know what, why don’t you man up and answer these three questions yourself?

            Sure
            1- Yes I am dating a girl that I chose and we are in a happy relationship at this time.
            2- No, I don’t believe a girl loses value by having sex- in fact the more they do it, the more they get better at it. They may have more than one partner in the past but that count itself doesn’t matter. I may insist on a blood test though to check for disease, and I’ll quote my own blood test in reply. In truth that has never been necessary, and my tests are still clean so whatever I’m doing works.
            3- No, because I don’t believe men lose value by having sex either. Both sexes lose value, however, when they cannot keep their word in terms of honesty.

            I have this hypothesis that you’re an arrogant sleazebag, and that’s why you’re struggling to comprehend why I don’t like sluts. It hits you too close to home.

            I comprehend why you think that way (since I used to be that way) but saw there was a better way. My lot with the fairer sex has improved since then, in terms of friendships and relationships.

            You have nothing but ad hominem so you resort to it, you can claim that handicap if you like. It doesn’t hurt me at all or hit anywhere near home, it just saddens me that you get into a straightjacket and proclaim as loud as you can, in a celebration of ignorance.

            lol. Are you saying that I’m not trendy and hip even though I write for a website called “intentious.” NO WAY!

            No, you are writing “WITNESS MY IGNORANCE” all over the site. If you think that’s edgy and non-comformist, all the more power to you. You’re as much entitled to your opinion as I am entitled to refute it.

            I can understand how you might think poorly of me for being like this.

            Well being controversial does make you a good intentious writer, as I have said. Perhaps your wider audience likes your writing style, or perhaps they like to rail at how much they abhor it.

            Seriously, you need to learn to read properly, or just admit, you only read the headings and jumped to a conclusion and asked an ignorant question.

            If you intend to anally nit-pick and lawyer your audience to death, it speaks of how difficult it must be to defend the position you have taken that you have to fight each point on technicalities.

            • September 13, 2012 at 3:24 pm #

              tl;dr, dc.

              • September 13, 2012 at 3:33 pm #

                an idea does not fit in your head lol
                a celebration of ignorance and yes, of bitterness.

              • September 14, 2012 at 1:17 pm #

                One thing to add… do you think you’ll luck out and be dating “the woman of your dreams” on your first pass?

                I’d say you need to see at least three or four lovers on average to know what you want and don’t want in a relationship. If seeing those three to four people over a few years makes you a “sleaze”… heaven help you find someone suitable.

                You better pray to whatever god you believe doesn’t exist that you luck out with the first woman you decide to copulate with.

                • September 14, 2012 at 1:33 pm #

                  Challenge accepted! 😉

                • Anon
                  September 19, 2012 at 4:52 am #

                  Richard, please return to trolling on 4chan.

              • Wilburt
                September 18, 2012 at 1:15 am #

                Same goes with your article 😛

                It was great fun to read this thread and watch you become increasingly hysterical/hostile/petulant, but I’d never waste my time reading those pages of assuredly nonsensical twaddle that you parped out back there.

                Peace 🙂

                • September 18, 2012 at 12:34 pm #

                  But if you didn’t read it how do you know it’s nonsensical taddle? ;-/

                  That’s ok, I have this point of view that if someone is too cowardly to put forward their own ideas to be ripped to shreds by others then they don’t actually have an opinion and therefore they don’t actually matter.

      • k8
        June 3, 2013 at 10:45 am #

        Don’t listen to him. Human beings are capable of being rational beings, but so many choose to ignore that aspect of themselves and give themselves up to being slaves to their animal urges. I would never ever date a man who slept around, because not only is he pathetic (ie: a slave to his own flesh), he is also likely to infect me with some kind of horrible disease that I don’t need. Trust me, you’re better off. You have no idea how many guys some of these girls go through in a year. Also, she might trick you into impregnating her, and you’re stuck with paying child support to her for the next two decades.

  4. Emma
    September 13, 2012 at 8:02 am #

    This article is the best thing I have ever read…..!

    • September 13, 2012 at 10:38 am #

      I thought the ladies of the world would like to know that there are still men who consider them superior to sluts and aren’t afraid of political correctness to say that out loud.

      • anon
        October 30, 2012 at 2:53 am #

        Thank you so much for this article! I commend you for stating an unpopular opinion in a well-spoken way and without fear of backlash. I’m sick of seeing mindless slut-glorifiying everywhere I turn. I’m not a religious nut or obsessed with “purity” or anything, and I don’t think people should never have sex or enjoy it; I’m just a girl who’s offended and put off by women who promote being promiscuous, one-track-minded sex robots. Apparently that’s enough to warrant being labled a slut-shamer, a prude, a hateful bitch, etc. by self-titled sluts who disagree with that opinion.

  5. September 13, 2012 at 11:25 am #

    As usual Jason your pieces make me laugh with their no holes barred provocation, but also you have a few very good points. Particularly liked the observation that there’s no “sleazeiness” movement currently accepted in society. (Not that there should be…)

    On this one though, “Have you ever had an interesting conversation with a slut that didn’t involve sex or the slut herself and all the things she likes to pamper herself with?”

    The answer is yes, actually, and it’s not that uncommon. I don’t think slutdom and intelligence, or being well read and being promiscuous, are mutually exclusive states. Even young strippers are mainly funding their university degrees these days.

    • September 13, 2012 at 12:37 pm #

      Yes, that’s the tragedy of this, there are intelligent interesting women out there who believe the feminist propaganda that being a slut, just to spite men, is liberating. It’s liberating in the same way it’s liberating for a five-year-old to eat a kilogram of chocolate by themselves to defy their parents. I’m not saying that men should be custodians over women, just that the attitude of doing something just to spite someone is childish and immature.

  6. September 14, 2012 at 9:57 am #

    1) I’m sick of the lady/whore dicothomy. There are multiple different reasons why someone might traditionally be called a slut including paradoxically by a man who has been turned down. Feminists promoting sluthood are concerned with women being shamed for being sexually active at all. What would you suggest as an altermative to solve this?

    2) Does a sexually active polyamorous woman count as a slut?

    3) Do prostitutes automatically count as sluts? (NB: I live in a country where prostitution is legal) From my understanding of your definitions the answer is no because their own sexual pleasure is not generally their main motivation.

    • September 14, 2012 at 1:29 pm #

      1) I’m sick of the good man/bad man dichotomy. There are multiple reasons why a man might be violent, poor and dirty. Women have no right to judge men sexually at all like this. Just because a man might be violent, poor and dirty doesn’t give women the right to decide not to sleep with him! What would you suggest as an alternative to solve this?

      2) Well, if she’s completely open about it, sexually responsible and doesn’t exploit men materially, then, yes, it’s fine. But I suspect it’s going to be very hard to live up to those three caveats and be polyamorous.

      3) Oh… you might need to read the article “Sabotaging Slutwalk, Like A Man.”

      • September 14, 2012 at 6:44 pm #

        I would argue that the good man/bad man dichotomy is the other side of the lady/whore dichotomy. I don’t think either is good. Sure women don’t have the right to judge. But they always have a right to say no. (As do men) Because every human has the right to feel safe. Being around violence or being told they can’t say no, will make anyone feel unsafe.

  7. al
    September 20, 2012 at 11:20 am #

    Good post Jason. Yeh, I can tell when I am in the presence of a real lady.

  8. September 24, 2012 at 10:06 am #

    Looks like your article got more hits that I first imagined. A popular conservative brazilian site used the translation in their own site aswell.

    Great job, Jason. This article of yours is a master piece.

    I may use another article again (keeping the link to your original).

    Have a nice week and God bless.

  9. A.
    October 2, 2012 at 2:48 am #

    I despise contemporary feminism for many reasons, including the culture of permissiveness that pretends that promiscuity is some kind of ~magical journey~ a modern girl must take in order to become valid as a woman. (As a well-informed young woman who put off sex until her recent wedding, you would be amazed at how often I was shamed or condescended to about it.)

    I agree with aspects of your article (although I’ve met several very intelligent “sluts” in my life), but I can’t help but notice that it is rife with righteous anger that makes your arguments pretty hard to stomach and pretty easy to disregard. (Not to mention that this can barely be called journalism.)

    On one hand, a woman (or man) who enjoys sex with her partner isn’t someone to be looked down on, as long as she is discreet, discerning, and responsible. You allude to this above, but I fear it gets drowned in your tide of hateful speech. Obviously a person who is cavalier about the number or caliber of partners she has doesn’t fall into the above category, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that s/he resembles the “slut” you describe above.

    What about the insecure girl who is not putting her pleasure first, but trying to accumulate worth through sex? Obviously the girl is sadly misinformed and is still responsible for her actions, but it doesn’t fit into the description above, so can she be called a slut?

  10. Lunarynth
    January 20, 2013 at 9:04 pm #

    You don’t deserve to breathe. You are a disgusting waste of a human and you deserve to be beaten senseless every day for the rest of your sad, lonely life.

    • February 7, 2013 at 10:10 am #

      That’s not really a relevant response to an intellectual discussion. Disagree all you like but take the violent threats out of it. If you can’t discuss something in an adult appropriate manner then take your mother’s advise, “If you can’t say anything [constructive], don’t say anything at all.”

  11. Anonymous
    January 21, 2013 at 7:08 am #

    This s why you’re relationship. And why Doc Phil ripped you apart. BAM!

    • February 7, 2013 at 10:11 am #

      These sentences make no sense. Also “ripped you apart”? We were clearly not watching the same interview.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Slut Dropping: the Slut-Shaming Craze “For Lulz” | Intentious - October 11, 2012

    […] Sluts versus Ladies (intentious.com) […]

  2. Losers Versus Gentlemen | Intentious - January 12, 2013

    […] was told by some of my female readers that I absolutely must follow on from the Ladies versus Sluts piece about the other half of the problem: Loser men.  However, I do want to keep this fresh and […]

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: