Catholic priest child molestation no worse than in other professions

There seems to be no end to the scandals buffeting the Roman Catholic church about the abuse of children; most recently in Germany, where the headmaster a school associated with a choir once run by the pope’s elder brother Georg Ratzinger has been exposed as an abuser. And there is no doubt that a lot of children were damaged for life by priests, and that this was mostly covered up by the hierarchy until recently. But was the Catholic church unfairly singled out? Aren’t all children vulnerable to exploitation, especially when they are poor and unwanted?

These questions lead into a thicket of horror. The most detailed statistics on child abuse for the Catholic clergy that I can find come from the John Jay Institute’s report drawn up for the American Catholic bishops’ conference. From this it emerges that the frequency of child abuse among Catholic priests is not remarkable but its pattern is. Although there are no figures for the number of abusers in the wider population, there are figure for the number of victims. These vary wildly: the most pessimistic survey finds that 27% of American women and 16% of men had “a history of childhood sexual abuse“; while the the most optimistic had 12.8% of women and 4.3% of men. Obviously a great deal depends here on the definition of abuse; also on the definition of “childhood”. In some of these surveys it runs up to 18, which is a couple of years above the age of consent in Britain.

The Catholic figures show that between about 4% of priests and deacons serving in the US between 1950 and 2002 had been accused of sexual abuse of someone under 18. In this country, the figure was a 10th of that: 0.4% But whereas the victims in the general population are overwhelmingly female, the pattern among American Catholic priests was quite different. Four out of five of their victims were male. Most were adolescents: two out of five were 14 or over; 15% were under 10.

This is vile, but whether it is more vile than the record of any other profession is not obvious. The concentration on boys makes the Catholic pattern of abuse stand out; what makes it so shocking is that parents trusted their children with priests. They stood in for the parents. But this isn’t all that different from the pattern in the wider world, either, where the vast majority of abuse comes from within families. The other point that makes the Catholic abuse is that it is nowadays very widely reported. It may be the best reported crime in the world: that, too tends to skew perceptions.

There are, however, some fragments of figures from the outside world suggesting that not many professions do better. Last year, it was reported that half of the girls fostered in social democratic Sweden in the 50s and 60s had been abused; according to Camila Batmanghelidjh550,000 children are reported to the social services in this country every year.

So why the concentration on Catholic priests and brothers? Perhaps I am unduly cynical, but I believe that all institutions attempt to cover up institutional wrongdoing although the Roman Catholic church has had a higher opinion of itself than most, and thus a greater tendency to lie about these things. Because it is an extremely authoritarian institution at least within the hierarchy, it is also one where there were few checks and balances on the misbehaviour of the powerful. The scandal has been loudest and most damaging in Ireland, because it came along just at the moment when the church was losing its power over society at large, and where it was no longer able to cover up what had happened, but still willing to try. Much the same is true in the diocese of Boston which was bankrupted by the scandal.

It doesn’t seem to be true, though, that this was a problem spread by Irish priests around the world, as some traditionalists have argued. Certainly, the geographical spread across the US was fairly even, and not concentrated in areas of high Irish settlement and tradition. But in Ireland the state was happy to hand over the problem of unwanted children to the church.

Certainly the safeguards against paedophilia in the priesthood are now among the tightest in the world. That won’t stop a steady trickle of scandals; but I think that objectively your child is less likely to be abused by a Catholic or Anglican priest in the west today than by the members of almost any other profession.


Author:
Andrew Brown
Source: 
Catholic child abuse in proportion | Andrew Brown | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Categories: Beliefs, Morals

Author:Andrew Beato

CEO, Chief Editor and founder of Intentious. Passionate comment enthusiast, amateur philosopher, Quora contributor, audiobook and general knowledge addict.

Subscribe to Intentious

Be notified by email whenever new pieces are posted by the blogging team tackling controversial current events or issues.

8 Comments on “Catholic priest child molestation no worse than in other professions”

  1. June 17, 2011 at 9:27 am #

    The Case of the Pope by Geoffrey Robertson goes into great detail on these figures and points out that the pattern of abuse in the USA, Germany and Ireland is the same. Just one important point of factual correction: the pope still hasn’t done anything about the problem… for which he was the primary cause of while head of the congress for the defence of the faith from 1981 to 2005.

    Currently at the cinemas is a historical movie called “Oranges and Sunshine” that exposes how the Christian Brothers used an illegal child immigration program from the UK to Australia to create a global pedophile ring. Very disturbing viewing.

    • June 17, 2011 at 10:23 am #

      Really want to see Oranges and Sunshine.

    • Jimmy
      June 17, 2011 at 9:38 pm #

      “Currently at the cinemas is a historical movie called “Oranges and Sunshine” that exposes how the Christian Brothers used an illegal child immigration program from the UK to Australia to create a global pedophile ring. Very disturbing viewing.”

      Really? We must not have been watching the same movie!

      • June 18, 2011 at 1:37 pm #

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congregation_of_Christian_Brothers#Scandals

        ^ The movie only looked at one children’s home WA, the Congregation of Christian Brothers, an Irish Catholic order founded in 1802 has been responsible for a huge chunk of the child sex scandals rocking the Church. Besides WA they’ve been active raping boys in Victoria, NSW, in Chicago, New York, Canada and of course in Ireland. The order has filed for bankruptcy and its 1,200 members are either in prison or in hiding.

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_abuse_scandal_in_the_Congregation_of_Christian_Brothers

        Actually this ^ article is still only a fraction of what horrors they’ve committed: because the number of cases of systematic abuse in Australia isn’t even properly summarised in it. But spend a few minutes of Google and you’ll quickly find that movie was only describing the beginning of the end of the Christian Brothers in Australia. May they perish.

        In short, orphan boys sent to the Christian brothers were sent into great danger across the world. If that doesn’t meet the criteria of an international pedophile ring then what do you want? Do want them to put up a sign outside of their orphanages saying, “Christian Brother’s international pedophiles inc.” What is your standard of proof?

  2. jimmy
    June 18, 2011 at 8:01 pm #

    Jason S, I am certainly not saying that saying that these atrocities did not happen! I was simply pointing out that your comment was misleading. The movie was about the forced migration of children from low socioeconomic situations in the UK to Australia. The sexual abuse of children was only touched on in the movie. To read your comment one may be led to believe that sexual abuse was all the movie was about.

    • June 19, 2011 at 2:55 pm #

      Hey, you’re right… sorry, in my head I wrote “a historical movie called “Oranges and Sunshine” that exposes, among other things, how the Christian Brothers…” my mistake.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. The Roman Catholic Church, often accused of dragging its feet on sexual abuse « Buzzer - June 20, 2011

    […] Catholic priest child molestation no worse than in other professions (intentious.com) […]

  2. Santorum Condemns Pornography, While Nominating An Accused Child Molester for a Congressional Honor « Malia Litman's Blog - March 19, 2012

    […] Zealand, Canada, Europe, Latin America, Africa, and Asia. . Some reports indicate that as many as 27% of American women and 16% of men have a history of childhood sexual […]

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: